Study Objectives: Despite frequent sleep disruption in the pediatric intensive care unit, bedside sleep monitoring in real time is currently not available. Supervised machine learning applied to electrocardiography data may provide a solution, because cardiovascular dynamics are directly modulated by the autonomic nervous system during sleep. Methods: This retrospective study used hospital-based polysomnography recordings obtained in noncritically ill children between 2017 and 2021. Six age categories were defined: 6–12 months, 1–3 years, 3–5 years, 5–9 years, 9–13 years, and 13–18 years. Features were derived in time, frequency, and nonlinear domain from preprocessed electrocardiography data. Sleep classification models were developed for 2, 3, 4, and 5 states using logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost classifiers during 5-fold nested cross-validation. Models were additionally validated across age categories. Results: A total of 90 noncritically ill children were included with a median (Q1, Q3) recording length of 549.0 (494.8, 601.3) minutes. The 3 models obtained an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.72–0.78 with minimal variation across classifiers and age categories. Balanced accuracies were 0.70–0.72, 0.59–0.61, 0.50–0.51, and 0.41–0.42 for 2, 3, 4, and 5 states, respectively. Generally, the XGBoost model obtained the highest balanced accuracy (P < .05), except for 5 states for which logistic regression excelled (P = .67). Conclusions: Electrocardiography-based machine learning models are a promising and noninvasive method for automated sleep classification directly at the bedside of noncritically ill children aged 6 months–18 years. Models obtained moderate-to-good performance for 2- and 3-state classification.

Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a lethal progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by upper motor neuron (UMN) and lower motor neuron (LMN) involvement. Their varying degree of involvement results in a clinical heterogenous picture, making clinical assessments of UMN signs in patients with ALS often challenging. We therefore explored whether instrumented assessment using robotic manipulation could potentially be a valuable tool to study signs of UMN involvement. Methods: We examined the dynamics of the wrist joint of 15 patients with ALS and 15 healthy controls using a Wristalyzer single-axis robotic manipulator and electromyography (EMG) recordings in the flexor and extensor muscles in the forearm. Multi-sinusoidal torque perturbations were applied, during which participants were asked to either relax, comply or resist. A neuromuscular model was used to study muscle viscoelasticity, e.g. stiffness (k) and viscosity (b), and reflexive properties, such as velocity, position and force feedback gains (kv, kp and kf, respectively) that dominated the responses. We further obtained clinical signs of LMN (muscle strength) and UMN (e.g. reflexes, spasticity) dysfunction, and evaluated their relation with the estimated neuromuscular model parameters. Results: Only force feedback gains (kf) were elevated in patients (p = 0.033) compared to controls. Higher kf, as well as the resulting reflexive torque (Tref), were both associated with more severe UMN dysfunction in the examined arm (p = 0.040 and p < 0.001). Patients with UMN symptoms in the examined arm had increased kf and Tref compared to controls (both p = 0.037). Neither of these measures was related to muscle strength, but muscle stiffness (k) was lower in weaker patients (p = 0.012). All these findings were obtained from the relaxed test. No differences were observed during the instructions comply and resist. Conclusions: This findings are proof-of-concept that instrumented assessment using robotic manipulation is a feasible technique in ALS, which may provide quantitative, operator-independent measures relating to UMN symptoms. Elevated force feedback gains, driving larger reflexive muscle torques, appear to be particularly indicative of clinically established levels of UMN dysfunction in the examined arm.

This study aimed to develop an open-source algorithm for the pressure-reactivity index (PRx) to monitor cerebral autoregulation (CA) in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) and compared derived optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPopt) with real-time CPP in relation to long-term outcome. Retrospective study in children (< 18 years) with sTBI admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring between 2016 and 2023. ICP was analyzed on an insult basis and correlated with outcome. PRx was calculated as Pearson correlation coefficient between ICP and mean arterial pressure. CPPopt was derived as weighted average of CPP-PRx over time. Outcome was determined via Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) scale at one year post-injury. Logistic regression and mixed effect models were developed to associate PRx and CPPopt with outcome. In total 50 children were included, 35 with favorable (PCPC 1–3) and 15 with unfavorable outcome (PCPC 4–6). ICP insults correlated with unfavorable outcome at 20 mmHg for 7 min duration. Mean CPPopt yield was 75.4% of monitoring time. Mean and median PRx and CPPopt yield associated with unfavorable outcome, with odds ratio (OR) 2.49 (1.38–4.50), 1.38 (1.08–1.76) and 0.95 (0.92–0.97) (p < 0.001). PRx thresholds 0.0, 0.20, 0.25 and 0.30 resulted in OR 1.01 (1.00–1.02) (p < 0.006). CPP in optimal range associated with unfavorable outcome on day one (0.018, p = 0.029) and four (-0.026, p = 0.025). Our algorithm can obtain optimal targets for pediatric neuromonitoring that showed association with long-term outcome, and is now available open source.

Objective: Accurate estimation of stiffness across anatomical levels (i.e., joint, muscle, and tendon) in vivo has long been a challenge in biomechanics. Recent advances in electromyography (EMG)-driven musculoskeletal modeling have allowed the non-invasive estimation of stiffness during dynamic joint rotations. Nevertheless, validation has been limited to the joint level due to a lack of simultaneous in vivo experimental measurements of muscle and tendon stiffness. Methods: With a focus on the triceps surae, we employed a novel perturbation-based experimental technique informed by dynamometry and ultrasonography to derive reference stiffness at the joint, muscle, and tendon levels simultaneously. Here, we propose a new EMG-driven model-based approach that does not require external joint perturbation, nor ultrasonography, to estimate multi-level stiffness. We present a novel set of closed-form equations that enables the person-specific tuning of musculoskeletal parameters dictating biological stiffness, including passive force-length relationships in modeled muscles and tendons. Results: Calibrated EMG-driven musculoskeletal models estimated the reference data with average normalized root-mean-square error ≈ 20%. Moreover, only when calibrated tendons were approximately four times more compliant than typically modeled, our approach could estimate multi-level reference stiffness. Conclusion: EMG-driven musculoskeletal models can be calibrated on a larger set of reference data to provide more realistic values for the biomechanical variables across multiple anatomical levels. Moreover, the tendon models that are typically used in musculoskeletal modeling are too stiff. Significance: Calibrated musculoskeletal models informed by experimental measurements give access to an augmented range of biomechanical variables that might not be easily measured with sensors alone.

Human hands are complex biomechanical systems that allow for dexterous tasks with many degrees of freedom. Coordination of the fingers is essential for many activities of daily living and involves integrating sensory signals. During this sensory integration, the central nervous system deals with the uncertainty of sensory signals. When handling compliant objects, force and position are related. Interactions with stiff objects result in reduced position changes and increased force changes compared to compliant objects. Literature has shown sensory integration of force and position at the shoulder. Nevertheless, differences in sensory requirements between proximal and distal joints may lead to different proprioceptive representations, hence findings at proximal joints cannot be directly transferred to distal joints, such as the digits. Here, we investigate the sensory integration of force and position during pinching. A haptic manipulator rendered a virtual spring with adjustable stiffness between the index finger and the thumb. Participants had to blindly reproduce a force against the spring. In both visual reference trials and blind reproduction trials, the relation between pinch force and spring compression was constant. However, by covertly changing the spring characteristics in catch trials into an adjusted force-position relation, the participants’ weighting of force and position could be revealed. In agreement with previous studies on the shoulder, participants relied more on force sense in trials with higher stiffness. This study demonstrated stiffness-dependent sensory integration of force and position feedback during pinching.

Background: After mild stroke persistent balance limitations may occur, creating a risk factor for fear of falling, falls, and reduced activity levels. Objective. To investigate whether individuals in the chronic phase after mild stroke show balance and gait limitations, elevated fall risk, reduced balance confidence, and physical activity levels compared to healthy controls. Methods: An observational case-control study was performed. Main outcomes included the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (mini-BEST), Timed Up and Go (TUG), 10-m Walking Test (10-MWT), and 6-item version Activity-specific Balance Confidence (6-ABC) scale which were measured in 1 session. Objectively measured daily physical activity was measured for 7 consecutive days. Fall rate in daily life was recorded for 12 months. Individuals after a mild stroke were considered eligible when they: (1) sustained a transient ischemic attack or stroke longer than 6 months ago, resulting in motor and/or sensory loss in the contralesional leg at the time of stroke, (2) showed (near-) complete motor function, that is, ≥24 points on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment—Lower Extremity (range: 0-28). Results: Forty-seven healthy controls and 70 participants after mild stroke were included. Participants with stroke fell more than twice as often as healthy controls, had a 2 point lower median score on the mini-BEST, were 1.7 second slower on TUG, 0.6 km/h slower on the 10-MWT, and had a 12% lower 6-ABC score. Intensity for both total activity (8%) as well as walking activity (6%) was lower in the participants with stroke, while no differences were found in terms of duration. Conclusions: Individuals in the chronic phase after a mild stroke demonstrate persistent balance limitations and have an increased fall risk. Our results point at an unmet clinical need in this population.

Background: Spasticity, i.e. stretch hyperreflexia, increases joint resistance similar to symptoms like hypertonia and contractures. Botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) injections are a widely used intervention to reduce spasticity. BoNT-A effects on spasticity are poorly understood, because clinical measures, e.g. modified Ashworth scale (MAS), cannot differentiate between the symptoms affecting joint resistance. This paper distinguishes the contributions of the reflexive and intrinsic pathways to ankle joint hyper-resistance for participants treated with BoNT-A injections. We hypothesized that the overall joint resistance and reflexive contribution decrease 6 weeks after injection, while returning close to baseline after 12 weeks. Methods: Nine participants with spasticity after spinal cord injury or after stroke were evaluated across three sessions: 0, 6 and 12 weeks after BoNT-A injection in the calf muscles. Evaluation included clinical measures (MAS, Tardieu Scale) and motorized instrumented assessment using the instrumented spasticity test (SPAT) and parallel-cascade (PC) system identification. Assessments included measures for: (1) overall resistance from MAS and fast velocity SPAT; (2) reflexive resistance contribution from Tardieu Scale, difference between fast and slow velocity SPAT and PC reflexive gain; and (3) intrinsic resistance contribution from slow velocity SPAT and PC intrinsic stiffness/damping. Results: Individually, the hypothesized BoNT-A effect, the combination of a reduced resistance (week 6) and return towards baseline (week 12), was observed in the MAS (5 participants), fast velocity SPAT (2 participants), Tardieu Scale (2 participants), SPAT (1 participant) and reflexive gain (4 participants). On group-level, the hypothesis was only confirmed for the MAS, which showed a significant resistance reduction at week 6. All instrumented measures were strongly correlated when quantifying the same resistance contribution. Conclusion: At group-level, the expected joint resistance reduction due to BoNT-A injections was only observed in the MAS (overall resistance). This observed reduction could not be attributed to an unambiguous group-level reduction of the reflexive resistance contribution, as no instrumented measure confirmed the hypothesis. Validity of the instrumented measures was supported through a strong association between different assessment methods. Therefore, further quantification of the individual contributions to joint resistance changes using instrumented measures across a large sample size are essential to understand the heterogeneous response to BoNT-A injections.

Knowledge on joint impedance during walking in various conditions is relevant for clinical decision-making and the development of robotic gait trainers, leg prostheses, leg orthotics and wearable exoskeletons. Whereas ankle impedance during walking has been experimentally assessed, knee and hip joint impedance during walking have not been identified yet. Here we developed and evaluated a lower limb perturbator to identify hip, knee and ankle joint impedance during treadmill walking. The lower limb perturbator (LOPER) consists of an actuator connected to the thigh via rods. The LOPER allows to apply force perturbations to a free-hanging leg, while standing on the contralateral leg, with a bandwidth of up to 39 Hz. While walking in minimal impedance mode, the interaction forces between LOPER and the thigh were low (<5N) and the effect on the walking pattern was smaller than the within-subject variability during normal walking. Using a non-linear multibody dynamical model of swing leg dynamics, the hip, knee and ankle joint impedance were estimated at three time points during the swing phase for nine subjects walking at a speed of 0.5 m/s. The identified model was well able to predict the experimental responses for the hip and knee, since the mean variance accounted (VAF) for was 99% and 96%, respectively. The ankle lacked a consistent response and the mean VAF of the model fit was only 77%, and therefore the estimated ankle impedance was not reliable. The averaged across-subjects stiffness varied between the three time points within 34-66 and 0-3.5 Nm/rad Nm/rad for the hip and knee joint respectively. The damping varied between 1.9-4.6 and 0.02-0.14 Nms/rad Nms/rad for hip and knee respectively. The developed LOPER has a negligible effect on the unperturbed walking pattern and allows to identify hip and knee impedance during the swing phase.

The simultaneous modulation of joint torque and stiffness enables humans to perform large repertoires of movements, while versatilely adapting to external mechanical demands. Multi-muscle force control is key for joint torque and stiffness modulation. However, the inability to directly measure muscle force in the intact moving human prevents understanding how muscle force causally links to joint torque and stiffness. Joint stiffness is predominantly estimated via joint perturbation-based experiments in combination with system identification techniques. However, these techniques provide joint-level stiffness estimations with no causal link to the underlying muscle forces. Moreover, the need for joint perturbations limits the generalizability and applicability to study natural movements. Here, we present an electromyography (EMG)-driven musculoskeletal modeling framework that can be calibrated to match reference joint torque and stiffness profiles simultaneously via a multi-term objective function. EMG-driven models calibrated on <2 s of reference torque and stiffness data could blindly estimate reference profiles across 100 s of data not used for calibration. Model calibrations using an objective function comprising torque and stiffness terms always provided less feasible solutions than an objective function comprising solely a torque term, thereby reducing the space of feasible muscle–tendon parameters. Results also showed the proposed framework's ability to estimate joint stiffness in unperturbed conditions, while capturing differences against stiffness profiles derived during perturbed conditions. The proposed framework may provide new ways for studying causal relationships between muscle force and joint torque and stiffness during movements in interaction with the environment, with broad implications across biomechanics, rehabilitation and robotics.

Tremor is thought to be an effect of oscillatory activity within the sensorimotor network. To date, the underlying pathological brain networks are not fully understood. Disentangling tremor activity from voluntary motor output and sensorimotor feedback systems is challenging. To better understand the intrinsic sensorimotor fingerprint underlying tremor, we aimed to disentangle the sensorimotor system into driving (motor) and feedback/compensatory (sensory) neuronal involvement, and aimed to pinpoint tremor activity in essential tremor (ET) and tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (PD) with a novel closed-loop approach. Eighteen ET patients, 14 tremor-dominant PD patients, and 18 healthy controls were included. An MR-compatible wrist manipulator was employed during functional MRI (fMRI) while muscle activity during (in)voluntary movements was concurrently recorded using electromyography (EMG). Tremor was quantified based on EMG and correlated to brain activity. Participants performed three tasks: an active wrist motor task, a passive wrist movement task, and rest (no wrist movement). The results in healthy controls proved that our experimental paradigm activated the expected motor and sensory networks separately using the active (motor) and passive (sensory) task. ET patients showed similar patterns of activation within the motor and sensory networks. PD patients had less activity during the active motor task in the cerebellum and basal ganglia compared to ET and healthy controls. EMG showed that in ET, tremor fluctuations correlated positively with activity in the inferior olive region, and that in PD tremor fluctuations correlated positively with cerebellar activity. Our novel approach with an MR-compatible wrist manipulator, allowed to investigate the involvement of the motor and sensory networks separately, and as such to better understand tremor pathophysiology. In ET sensorimotor network function did not differ from healthy controls. PD showed less motor-related activity. Focusing on tremor, our results indicate involvement of the inferior olive in ET tremor modulation, and cerebellar involvement in PD tremor modulation.

Joint impedance is a common way of representing human joint dynamics. Since ankle joint impedance varies within the gait cycle, time-varying system identification techniques can be used to estimate it. Commonly, time-varying system identification techniques assume repeatably of joint impedance over cyclic motions, without taking into consideration the inherent variability of human behavior. In this paper, a method that assumes smooth, cyclic joint impedance, yet allows for cycle-to-cycle variability, is proposed. The method was tested on isometric, cyclic experimental data from the ankle under conditions with a time variation comparable to the expected one during the gait cycle. The estimated model could describe the data with high accuracy (VAF of 94.96%) and retrieve realistic inertia, damping and stiffness parameters. The results provide motivation to further apply the method on experiments under dynamic conditions and to employ the proposed method as a tool for investigating the human joint dynamics during cyclic movements.

Recent studies have established the presence of nociceptive steady-state evoked potentials (SSEPs), generated in response to thermal or intra-epidermal electric stimuli. This study explores cortical sources and generation mechanisms of nociceptive SSEPs in response to intra-epidermal electric stimuli. Our method was to stimulate healthy volunteers (n = 22, all men) with 100 intra-epidermal pulse sequences. Each sequence had a duration of 8.5 s, and consisted of pulses with a pulse rate between 20 and 200 Hz, which was frequency modulated with a multisine waveform of 3, 7 and 13 Hz (n = 10, 1 excluded) or 3 and 7 Hz (n = 12, 1 excluded). As a result, evoked potentials in response to stimulation onset and contralateral SSEPs at 3 and 7 Hz were observed. The SSEPs at 3 and 7 Hz had an average time delay of 137 ms and 143 ms respectively. The evoked potential in response to stimulation onset had a contralateral minimum (N1) at 115 ms and a central maximum (P2) at 300 ms. Sources for the multisine SSEP at 3 and 7 Hz were found through beamforming near the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex. Sources for the N1 were found near the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex. Sources for the N2-P2 were found near the supplementary motor area. Harmonic and intermodulation frequencies in the SSEP power spectrum remained below a detectable level and no evidence for nonlinearity of nociceptive processing, i.e. processing of peripheral firing rate into cortical evoked potentials, was found.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising tool to improve and speed up motor rehabilitation after stroke, but inconsistent clinical effects refrain tDCS from clinical implementation. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the need for individualized tDCS configurations in stroke, considering interindividual variability in brain anatomy and motor function representation. We simulated tDCS in individualized MRI-based finite element head models of 21 chronic stroke subjects and 10 healthy age-matched controls. An anatomy-based stimulation target, i.e. the motor hand knob, was identified with MRI, whereas a motor function-based stimulation target was identified with EEG. For each subject, we simulated conventional anodal tDCS electrode configurations and optimized electrode configurations to maximize stimulation strength within the anatomical and functional target. The normal component of the electric field was extracted and compared between subjects with stroke and healthy, age-matched controls, for both targets, during conventional and optimized tDCS. Electrical field strength was significantly lower, more variable and more frequently in opposite polarity for subjects with stroke compared to healthy age-matched subjects, both for the anatomical and functional target with conventional, i.e. non-individualized, electrode configurations. Optimized, i.e. individualized, electrode configurations increased the electrical field strength in the anatomical and functional target for subjects with stroke but did not reach the same levels as in healthy subjects. Considering individual brain structure and motor function is crucial for applying tDCS in subjects with stroke. Lack of individualized tDCS configurations in subjects with stroke results in lower electric fields in stimulation targets, which may partially explain the inconsistent clinical effects of tDCS in stroke trials.

Careful control of joint impedance, or dynamic joint stiffness, is crucial for successful performance of movement. Time-varying system identification (TV-SysID) enables quantification of joint impedance during movement. Several TV-SysID methods exist, but have never been systematically compared. Here, we simulate time-varying joint behavior and propose three performance metrics that enable to quantify and compare TV-SysID methods. Time-varying joint stiffness is simulated using a square wave and subsequently estimated with three TV-SysID methods: the ensemble, short data segment, and basis impulse response function method. These methods were compared based on (1) bias with respect to the simulated joint stiffness, (2) random error across 100 simulation trials, and (3) maximum adaptation speed in joint stiffness that can be captured. This approach revealed that each TV-SysID method has its own unique properties. The simulation method and performance metrics pave the way for developing a framework to quantify the strengths and weaknesses of TV-SysID algorithms for estimating joint impedance.

Joint impedance plays an important role in postural control and movement. However, current experimental knowledge on lower limb impedance during gait is limited to the ankle joint. We designed the LOwer limb PERturbator (LOPER) aimed to assess knee and hip joint impedance during gait. The LOPER applies force perturbations with a 39 Hz bandwidth, tested on a free-hanging leg. In minimal impedance mode, peak interaction forces during walking are low (&lt; 5 N). Also, this mode has a negligible effect on the gait pattern, as it is smaller than the within-subject variability during normal walking. In short, the LOPER is a transparent device able to elicit a clear response at both hip and knee joints to investigate lower limb dynamics. A second motor added to the LOPER could improve isolation of the perturbation contribution to knee and hip dynamics. People with neurological disorders can benefit from knowledge of joint impedance during gait through improved biomimetic devices and clinical decision making.

Accurate and swift tuning of joint impedance is crucial to perform movement and interaction with our environment. Time-varying system identification enables quantification of joint impedance during movement. Many methods have been developed over the years, each with their own mathematical approach and underlying assumptions. Yet, for the identification of joint impedance, a systematic comparison revealing each method's unique strengths and weaknesses, is lacking. Here, we propose a quantitative framework to compare these methods. The framework is used to review five time-varying system identification methods using both simulated data and experimental data. These methods included three time-domain methods: ensemble, short data segment, and basis impulse response function; and two frequency-domain methods: ensemble spectral, and kernel-based regression. In the simulation study, joint stiffness – the static component of impedance – was simulated as a square wave to mimic the most extreme case of time-varying behavior. The identification results were compared based on the (1) variance accounted for (VAF), (2) bias, (3) random, and (4) total estimation error with respect to the simulated joint stiffness; and (5) rise time between two stiffness levels. In the experimental study, human ankle joint impedance was identified. Identification performance was compared using the variability in estimating joint stiffness – representative of the random error – and VAF. The performance metrics revealed distinct identification properties for each method. Therefore, researchers must make a well-justified decision which method is most appropriate for their application. The combination of simulation and experimental work with extensive performance quantification creates a framework for quantitative assessment of newly developed time-varying system identification methods.

In vivo joint stiffness estimation during time-varying conditions remains an open challenge. Multiple communities, e.g. system identification and biomechanics, have tackled the problem from different perspectives and using different methods, each of which entailing advantages and limitations, often complementary. System identification formulations provide data-driven estimates of stiffness at the joint level, while biomechanics often relies on musculoskeletal models to estimate stiffness at multiple levels, i.e. joint, muscle, and tendon. Collaboration across these two scientific communities seems to be a logical step toward a reliable multi-level understanding of joint stiffness. However, differences at the theoretical, computational, and experimental levels have limited inter-community interaction. In this article we present a roadmap to achieve a unified framework for the estimation of time-varying stiffness in the composite human neuromusculoskeletal system during movement. We present our perspective on future developments to obtain data-driven system identification and musculoskeletal models that are compatible at the theoretical, computational, and experimental levels. Moreover, we propose a novel combined closed-loop paradigm, in which reference estimates of joint stiffness via system identification are decomposed into underlying muscle and tendon contribution via high-density-electromyography-driven musculoskeletal modeling. We highlight the need for aligning experimental requirements to be able to compare both joint stiffness formulations. Unifying both biomechanics' and system identification's formulations is a necessary step for truly generalizing stiffness estimation across individuals, movement conditions, training and impairment levels. From an application point of view, this is central for enabling patient-specific neurorehabilitation therapies, as well as biomimetic control of assistive robotic technologies. The roadmap we propose could serve as an inspiration for future collaborations across broadly different scientific communities to truly understand joint stiffness bio- and neuromechanics.

Introduction: Sensorimotor control can be disturbed because of pain and trauma. There is scarce comprehension about which component of the sensorimotor system would benefit the most from treatment in distal radius fracture (DRF). Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the sensorimotor control of subjects with a history of DRF impaired compared with healthy subjects. If so, which component of the sensorimotor system is most affected. Methods: Nine healthy participants and 11 participants with a DRF history executed posture and reproduction tasks in interaction with a robotic wrist manipulator. A posture task with force perturbations assess sensorimotor control. Position and force reproduction tasks assessed sensory feedback. Electromyography recorded the muscle activity to study the motor part of the sensorimotor system. Study Design: Cross-sectional case-control. Results: The results showed that the motor responses to the perturbations during the posture task did not differ significantly, whereas the position reproduction did significantly differ between the 2 groups. Moreover, participants with a DRF history did not adapt to the changed dynamics of the environment during the posture task, whereas the controls did. Discussion: The results of this study imply that processing of sensory position feedback is impaired in people with a DRF history while sensorimotor control during a posture task is unaffected. A possible explanation for these results is that different neural networks are involved during reproduction and posture tasks. Conclusions: A history of DRF is related to disturbed processing of sensory feedback of the sensorimotor system, especially the Joint Position Sense, which leads to an impairment in detecting a changed environment and adapting to it. Impaired Joint Position Sense and thereby the inability to adapt adequately to a changing environment should be taken into account during the rehabilitation of patients with DRF.