Preference-based reinforcement learning (RL) poses as a recent research direction in robot learning, by allowing humans to teach robots through preferences on pairs of desired behaviours. Nonetheless, to obtain realistic robot policies, an arbitrarily large number of queries is required to be answered by humans. In this work, we approach the sample-efficiency challenge by presenting a technique which synthesizes queries, in a semi-supervised learning perspective. To achieve this, we leverage latent variational autoencoder (VAE) representations of trajectory segments (sequences of state-action pairs). Our approach manages to produce queries which are closely aligned with those labeled by humans, while avoiding excessive uncertainty according to the human preference predictions as determined by reward estimations. Additionally, by introducing variation without deviating from the original human's intents, more robust reward function representations are achieved. We compare our approach to recent state-of-the-art preference-based RL semi-supervised learning techniques. Our experimental findings reveal that we can enhance the generalization of the estimated reward function without requiring additional human intervention. Lastly, to confirm the practical applicability of our approach, we conduct experiments involving actual human users in a simulated social navigation setting. Videos of the experiments can be found at https://sites.google.com/view/rl-sequel

@en

Safety is crucial for autonomous drones to operate close to humans. Besides avoiding unwanted or harmful contact, people should also perceive the drone as safe. Existing safe motion planning approaches for autonomous robots, such as drones, have primarily focused on ensuring physical safety, e.g., by imposing constraints on motion planners. However, studies indicate that ensuring physical safety does not necessarily lead to perceived safety. Prior work in Human-Drone Interaction (HDI) shows that factors such as the drone's speed and distance to the human are important for perceived safety. Building on these works, we propose a parameterized control barrier function (CBF) that constrains the drone's maximum deceleration and minimum distance to the human and update its parameters on people's ratings of perceived safety. We describe an implementation and evaluation of our approach. Results of a withinsubject user study (Ng= 15) show that we can improve perceived safety of a drone by adjusting to people individually.

@en

Practical implementations of deep reinforcement learning (deep RL) have been challenging due to an amplitude of factors, such as designing reward functions that cover every possible interaction. To address the heavy burden of robot reward engineering, we aim to leverage subjective human preferences gathered in the context of human-robot interaction, while taking advantage of a baseline reward function when available. By considering baseline objectives to be designed beforehand, we are able to narrow down the policy space, solely requesting human attention when their input matters the most. To allow for control over the optimization of different objectives, our approach contemplates a multi-objective setting. We achieve human-compliant policies by sequentially training an optimal policy from a baseline specification and collecting queries on pairs of trajectories. These policies are obtained by training a reward estimator to generate Pareto optimal policies that include human preferred behaviours. Our approach ensures sample efficiency and we conducted a user study to collect real human preferences, which we utilized to obtain a policy on a social navigation environment.@en

Rearranging objects is an essential skill for robots. To quickly teach robots new rearrangements tasks, we would like to generate training scenarios from high-level specifications that define the relative placement of objects for the task at hand. Ideally, to guide the robot's learning we also want to be able to rank these scenarios according to their difficulty. Prior work has shown how generating diverse scenario from specifications and providing the robot with easy-to-difficult samples can improve the learning. Yet, existing scenario generation methods typically cannot generate diverse scenarios while controlling their difficulty. We address this challenge by conditioning generative models on spatial logic specifications to generate spatially-structured scenarios that meet the specification and desired difficulty level. Our experiments showed that generative models are more effective and data-efficient than rejection sam-pling and that the spatially-structured scenarios can drastically improve training of downstream tasks by orders of magnitude.

@en

Reinforcement learning has shown great potential for learning sequential decision-making tasks. Yet, it is difficult to anticipate all possible real-world scenarios during training, causing robots to inevitably fail in the long run. Many of these failures are due to variations in the robot's environment. Usually experts are called to correct the robot's behavior; however, some of these failures do not necessarily require an expert to solve them. In this work, we query non-experts online for help and explore 1) if/how non-experts can provide feedback to the robot after a failure and 2) how the robot can use this feedback to avoid such failures in the future by generating shields that restrict or correct its high-level actions. We demonstrate our approach on common daily scenarios of a simulated kitchen robot. The results indicate that non-experts can indeed understand and repair robot failures. Our generated shields accelerate learning and improve data-efficiency during retraining.

@en

Despite the successes of deep reinforcement learning (RL), it is still challenging to obtain safe policies. Formal verification approaches ensure safety at all times, but usually overly restrict the agent's behaviors, since they assume adversarial behavior of the environment. Instead of assuming adversarial behavior, we suggest to focus on perceived safety instead, i.e., policies that avoid undesired behaviors while having a desired level of conservativeness. To obtain policies that are perceived as safe, we propose a shield synthesis framework with two distinct loops: (1) an inner loop that trains policies with a set of actions that is constrained by shields whose conservativeness is parameterized, and (2) an outer loop that presents example rollouts of the policy to humans and collects their feedback to update the parameters of the shields in the inner loop. We demonstrate our approach on a RL benchmark of Lunar landing and a scenario in which a mobile robot navigates around humans. For the latter, we conducted two user studies to obtain policies that were perceived as safe. Our results indicate that our framework converges to policies that are perceived as safe, is robust against noisy feedback, and can query feedback for multiple policies at the same time.

@en

Driving styles play a major role in the acceptance and use of autonomous vehicles. Yet, existing motion planning techniques can often only incorporate simple driving styles that are modeled by the developers of the planner and not tailored to the passenger. We present a new approach to encode human driving styles through the use of signal temporal logic and its robustness metrics. Specifically, we use a penalty structure that can be used in many motion planning frameworks, and calibrate its parameters to model different automated driving styles. We combine this penalty structure with a set of signal temporal logic formula, based on the Responsibility-Sensitive Safety model, to generate trajectories that we expected to correlate with three different driving styles: aggressive, neutral, and defensive. An online study showed that people perceived different parameterizations of the motion planner as unique driving styles, and that most people tend to prefer a more defensive automated driving style, which correlated to their self-reported driving style.

@en

Many researchers have started to explore natural interaction scenarios for children. No matter if these children are normally developing or have special needs, evaluating Child- Robot Interaction (CRI) is a challenge. To find methods that work well and provide reliable data is difficult, for example because commonly used methods such as questionnaires do not work well particularly with younger children. Previous research has shown that children need support in expressing how they feel about technology. Given this, researchers often choose time-consuming behavioral measures from observations to evaluate CRI. However, these are not necessarily comparable between studies and robots. This workshop aims to bring together researchers from different disciplines to share their experiences on these aspects. The main topics are methods to evaluate child-robot interaction design, methods to evaluate socially assistive child-robot interaction and multi-modal evaluation of child-robot interaction. Connected questions that we would like to tackle are for example: i) What are reliable metrics in CRI? ii) How can we overcome the pitfalls of survey methods in CRI? iii) How can we integrate qualitative approaches in CRI? iv) What are the best practices for in the wild studies with children? Looking across disciplinary boundaries, we want to discuss advantages and shortcomings of using different evaluation methods in order to compile guidelines for future CRI research. This workshop is the second in a series that started at the International Conference on Social Robotics in 2015.

@en