Visual impairment affects over 2.2 billion individuals globally, emphasizing the critical need for effective assistive technologies. This work focuses on developing a video captioning model explicitly tailored for visually impaired users, leveraging advancements in deep learning techniques. Video captioning involves converting video frames into textual descriptions, effectively bridging the domains of computer vision (CV) and natural language processing (NLP). We surveyed young visually impaired individuals from the Visio organization, who provided key insights into the design of our model.
We enhance the existing S2VT model by modifying its temporal attention mechanism to improve the recognition of visual surroundings, addressing the unique challenges visually impaired individuals face.
This research explores critical questions surrounding the model's sensitivity to actions, the readability of generated captions, and methods for latency reduction. To evaluate the model's effectiveness, we implement readability metrics—an approach not previously utilized in video captioning assessments. Our findings contribute to enhancing accessibility and independence for visually impaired individuals through advanced video captioning solutions.

The consumer lending domain has increasingly leveraged Artificial Intelligence (AI) to make loan approval processes more efficient and to make use of larger amount of information to predict their applicants’ repayment ability. Over time, however, valid concerns have been raised about whether decisions made about individuals using these data-driven technologies can lead to bias against women. In an attempt to assess the fairness of an algorithm, 21 prominent definitions of fairness have been proposed by the computer science community over the years. However, what remains absent is consensus on which definitions are suitable for assessing gender equality in consumer lending. There is also a lack of knowledge on how to appropriately implement these metrics in practice. To tackle the problems mentioned above, this research has investigated how automated loan approval processes can be assessed for gender equality. Two essential elements for assessing predictive tools were identified and investigated through a separate research question: What fairness metrics are suitable for assessing gender equality in consumer lending? How can the metrics be applied to observe gender bias in lending history data? Based on the questions above, the research was conducted in two stages: Stage 1 focused on analyzing the prominent definitions of group fairness, but before doing so, it conceptualizes gender equality in consumer lending by conducting an extensive literature review encompassing domains of philosophy, economics, gender studies, and history. In investigating the first research question, it is found that group fairness metrics are a measure of distributive justice. These metrics are based on three different statistical criteria commonly known as independence, sufficiency, and separation and each underlie different moral assumptions which should be verified based on the application scenario at hand. In Stage 2 of this work, the second research question was investigated by conducting an exploratory case study in which a logistic regression model is built to classify a sample of loan applicants in an open source dataset. Both the dataset and the model are then tested for bias using IBM’s open source Python AIF36 toolkit. After applying the group fairness metrics, it was found that the choice of separation and sufficiency can have different repercussions for each demographic group in the dataset. When false distribution of utility is under inspection, sufficiency advantaged male applicants more than the female applicants while separation advantages males more than females. Such inconsistency highlights the importance of realizing how relevant distribution of harm/benefit depends on the choice of fairness criteria made by decision makers. Lastly, the research provides an extensive discussion on possible root causes of bias and some recommendations to managers and data stewards on how to tackle bias issues that stakeholders may face in the context of consumer lending.

Social Robotics is an emerging field in Computer Science. Most social robots currently commercially available to buy do not have fast hardware components. As a result, the built-in software has low accuracy and performance with (amongst others) speech and facial recognition and dialogs during social interaction with users. Cloud computation offers state-of-the-art techniques, performance, and accuracy with its massive available computational power, but at extra costs and increased latency.

In this work, we extend and improve a social robot's standard capabilities and performance by making use of cloud computation. This thesis covers an exploration for the trade-offs present when replacing or augmenting built-in robot software with IBM cloud services, based on the humanoid Pepper robot from Softbank.

The approach for this exploration was guided by a hospitality use case demonstrated in the offices of two companies: a Dutch Health Insurer and IBM Netherlands. Two products were developed for this single use case based on different development toolboxes. The first toolbox contains all development software from the robot's manufacturer (the NAOqi toolbox), while the second toolbox makes use of cloud services (the Watson Toolbox). Using the product built with the NAOqi toolbox, we evaluate interactions with real users and obtain baseline data and experiences. After evaluating the second product built with the Watson toolbox, we can compare differences in human-robot interaction quality, robot component quality, development methods, and software engineering complexity and Total Costs of Ownership for both products.

The main findings include an overview of relevant test metrics and test methods for a social robot's component, including acquired data for some components of the Pepper robot. We show possible architectures for a (semi) cloud-based system, and their trade-offs. Evaluations show that the cloud-based system indeed performs better and has higher human-interaction quality compared to the product built with the NAOqi toolbox, yet downsides such as latency and operating costs are present. This is also reflected in the analysis of single components, where specifically Speech-to-Text from the cloud shows a significant increase in performance and capabilities. We show that a mix of toolboxes results in the best working and cheapest social robot when considering Total Cost of Ownership. IBM Cloud pricing structures and operating costs are analyzed for this. Finally, we contribute to the currently available knowledge on this subject with a decision matrix combining all previously mentioned information in a compact form accessible to people not knowledgeable in the hospitality robot or cloud domains. With the matrix, early-development advice decisions for creating a social robot can be formulated using the data gathered in this thesis.

With a broad approach, this research focuses on finding and discussing trade-offs, rather than an in-depth analysis of all components. Providing methods to determine the data as mentioned above, findings, and trade-offs are more important than the actual numbers found in this thesis, as advances in this domain are quick and expected to change often. The end product built using the Watson toolbox is an improvement on multiple levels, yet is still not always able to autonomously and correctly finish all intended interactions. However, its capabilities, performance, and robustness are closer to the level of being used commercially. The techniques we use to extend Pepper's capabilities could be applied to any social robot.

In this thesis the automatic multimodal detection of social and task cohesion in meetings is studied. The presence of social and task cohesion has positive benefits on employee well-being, creativity and productiveness, and can therefore be used to assess meeting quality. Conversational partners imitate each other's body language and speech characteristics to have smoother interactions, to increase liking, and it can cause a coordination of expectations. We hypothesize that social and task cohesion are therefore positively related to the imitation of both body language and speech characteristics. As the group-level alignment of non-verbal speech behaviour has been previously linked to social and task cohesion in meetings, this thesis investigates the relationship between cohesion in meetings and both motion and posture mimicry from accelerometer and video data. Motion mimicry is described using accelerometer features previously used for the detection of friendly and romantic attraction in pairs. We propose a method to convert these features to group-level descriptors of mimicry. The same quantifications of mimicry are also applied to video-based motion quantifiers that have been previously used to detect team cohesion. Appearance is described using HOG descriptors from densely-sampled feature points that are tracked over time. To our knowledge this is the first-time appearance similarity is used to estimate cohesion. We also test if a multimodal mimicry model performs better than a unimodal mimicry model to investigate if the different forms of mimicry contain complementary information. Our group-level movement mimicry features detect social cohesion with average an area under the ROC-curve of 0.64 for social cohesion, and the accelerometer-based movement mimicry features specifically detect task cohesion with an average AUC of 0.63. The multimodal combination of the different features does improve over the unimodal models with an area under the ROC-curve of 0.68 for social cohesion and 0.65 for task cohesion. This shows both that movement mimicry is an indicator of verbal expressions of cohesion, and that measuring mimicry in different modalities can better model cohesion than a unimodal model. Further experiments are recommended for general appearance feature mimicry, specifically in the method used to measure mimicry, to confirm or deny if these are related to cohesion.

Training machine learning (ML) models for natural language processing usually requires lots of data that is often acquired through crowdsourcing. In crowdsourcing, crowd workers annotate data samples according to one or more properties, such as the sentiment of a sentence, the violence of a video segment, the aesthetics of an image, ... To ensure quality of the annotations, several workers annotate the same sample, and their annotations are combined into one unique label using aggregation techniques such as majority voting.

When the property to be annotated by the workers is subjective, the workers’ annotations for one same sample might differ, but all be valid. The way the annotations are aggregated can have an effect on the fairness of the outputs of the trained model. For example only accounting for the majority vote leads to ignoring the workers’ opinions which differ from the majority and consequently being discriminative towards certain workers. Also, ML models are not always designed to account for individual opinions, for simplicity's or performance's sake. Finally, to the best of our knowledge, no method exists to assess the fairness of a ML algorithm predicting a subjective property. In this thesis we address such limitations by seeking an answer to the following research question: how can targeted crowdsourcing be used to increase the fairness of ML algorithms trained for subjective properties' prediction?

We investigate how annotation aggregation via majority voting creates a dataset bias towards the majority opinion, and how this dataset bias in combination with the current limits of ML models lead to an algorithmic bias of the ML models trained with this dataset and unfairness in the model’s outputs. We assume that an ML model able to return each annotation of each user is a fair model. We propose a new evaluation method of the ML models' fairness, and a methodology to highlight and mitigate potential unfairness based on the creation of adapted training datasets and ML models.
Although our work is applicable to any kind of label aggregation for any data subject to multiple interpretations, we focus on the effects of the bias introduced by majority voting for the task of predicting sentence toxicity.

Our results show that the fairness evaluation method that we create enables to identify unfair algorithms and compare algorithmic fairness, and the final fairness metric is usable in the training process of ML models. The experiments on the models point out that we can mitigate the biases resulting from majority voting and increase the fairness towards the minority opinions. This is provided that the workers’ individual information and each of their annotations are taken into account when training adapted models, rather than only relying on the aggregated annotations, and that the dataset is resampled on criteria according to the favoured aspect of fairness. We also highlight that more work needs to be done to develop crowdsourcing methods to collect high-quality annotations of subjective properties, possibly at low-cost.