The surge in demand for inland vessel goods transportation has necessitated the operation of larger vessels with increased drafts. These larger vessels generate significant induced loads from their more powerful bow thrusters during berthing and mooring. These loads can lead to scour, which ultimately results in instability of the quay wall. To counteract this, stone gradings are penetrated with colloidal concrete as bottom protection. However, prior studies indicate that the flow velocity profile perpendicular to a quay wall decreases more rapidly than guidelines suggest, implying a potential reduction in the extent of colloidal concrete application. This is relevant for the Netherlands, where a multitude of hydraulic structures, including an estimated 130 locks, are in need of renovation or replacement. \\

\noindent This study seeks to comprehend the impact of bow thruster-induced loads directly perpendicular to the quay wall, on stone displacement near a quay wall and this study compares the outcomes of this field measurement with existing guidelines and scale modelling. The research question is therefore: ''\textit{How can results from a full-scale test improve the design and performance of loose-rock bottom protection against bow thruster-induced loads for quay walls accommodating inland vessels?}''\\

\noindent In order to answer this question a full-scale field measurement is conducted with the largest inland vessel in Europe. During this field measurement, free flow tests were performed and bottom velocity, pressure fluctuations and stone displacement were determined. \\

\noindent The applied bow thruster power and under keel clearance are marked as two important parameters for stone displacement. For the impact of this applied bow thruster power and under keel clearance, a variety of scenarios is examined. After each scenario a survey is done to look at individual stone displacement. Velocity measurements are taken to get more information about the flow velocities. The velocities were measured relatively far away from the bottom, resulting in low velocities. The actual bottom velocity is determined by validating and using the findings of the scale modelling performed by \textcites{Deltares}.\\

\noindent Free flow tests are performed to directly measure the outflow velocity and compare it with existing guidelines. From these tests, it is concluded that the existing guidelines for outflow velocity result in an overestimation of the required $d_{n50}$, with a measured loss coefficient of 0.65 as opposed to the proposed 0.90. Even with the reduced loss factor for the outflow velocity, the bottom velocity calculated with the Dutch method guideline is higher compared to the actual bottom velocities, demonstrating again, as already indicated in prior studies, that the guidelines are too conservative. \\

\noindent The turbulence intensity values play a significant role in validating the findings derived from scale modelling conducted by Deltares. The measured turbulent intensity values show similarities with the earlier findings, indicating a turbulent environment and validation of the Deltares scale modelling. \\

\noindent Based on pressure measurements, it is estimated that at the onset of movement, the pressure differences of the turbulent eddies are in the order of 50 to 90\% of the critical force to cause stone movement. \\

\noindent The in this study developed parameter R = $\frac{V_0}{UKC} \cdot t \cdot \frac{1}{k_{sl}} \cdot C_R $ shows that an increase in applied bow thruster power, a decrease in under keel clearance, an increase in duration and in slope lead to a linear relation with the normalised cross-section area of the near-quay erosion hole. \\

\noindent In addition, the full-scale field measurement showed that the stone displacement predominantly occurs within the first two and a half meters of the bottom protection, suggesting a possible reduction in the width of the colloidal concrete application. For a fictive quay wall the suggested reduction is compared with the design following the original guidelines. The suggested reduction alternative could save 75\% of the amount of colloidal concrete and CO$_2$ emissions.

The Mekong Delta is facing some complicated challenges in the near future. Its geographical location and the fact that it is a delta result in low elevation levels which makes it vulnerable to inundation. This problem will only become bigger in the future due to the effects of climate change. To get funding from organisations like the world bank it is important to propose multiple solutions that are beneficial to multiple parts of society. It is favourable to split
a complex system like the Mekong Delta into subsystems to make it more feasible to build realistic models. The subsystem defined in this report is the Hau River estuary. This area mainly suffers from riverine inundation caused by tidal variation in the South Chinese Sea. The biggest city in the region is Can Tho with 1.3 million inhabitants.

The research question is: Which integrated solutions reduce riverine inundation problems in the Hau River estuary while also considering socio-economical aspects? To answer this research question the following four solutions are proposed and designed.

• Discharge sluice in the mouth of the Hau River to reduce the tidal influence

• Wetland with a double levee system and buffer zones to reduce peak discharge

• Bypass channel to the Gulf of Thailand to reduce discharge during the wet season

• Protection of valuable assets and adaptation of local citizens to the new natural balance

Based on desired discharges and water levels preliminary design parameters of the proposed hydraulic structures were determined. The effectiveness of these solutions was assessed based on their ability to reduce the water level in Can Tho. The reduction that the discharge sluice achieved was determined with a zero-dimensional model, whereas the water level reduction that the wetlands and bypass option achieved were determined by Delft3D models. The discharge sluice performed best in reducing the water level in Can Tho, as it opposes the tidal influence in the Hau River.

To assess the quality of the solutions relative to each other a best-worst multi-criteria analysis is done. In this assessment other factors such as financial aspects, socio-economics and transportation are taken into account. The most important criteria are flood reduction and funding opportunities. According to the assessed criteria, the discharge sluice and the wetland are the best-scoring solutions. These solutions have the most potential in reducing the river inundation problems in the Hau River estuary. This does not mean that the bypass and adaptation solutions should be neglected or are not useful. For a complex problem in a complex system like the Hau River estuary, one solution is not going to solve all the problems. A good balance between different aspects has to be determined by also considering other problems like sand mining, subsidence and salt intrusion.