Mechanized tunnel excavation in soils causes over-excavations, potentially leading to large amounts of spoil and settlements at ground level. An accurate estimation of over-excavations is crucial in the pre-design phase for assessing costs, determining the appropriate excavation method and choosing the muck management strategy. Currently, the estimation is based on experience and data from similar projects, but it becomes difficult when project conditions are heterogeneous. Alternatively, finite element analyses are time-consuming and not suitable for early design stages and, therefore, simplified tools are needed. In this paper, the authors present a simplified approach putting in relation face extrusion with estimated spoil mass and face volume loss. This approach, conceived for deep tunnels, is the extension to the case of mechanized tunnelling of a hydro-mechanical coupled meta-model derived from finite element numerical analyses for tunnels in clayey soils excavated by using conventional techniques (i.e. without any use of tunnel boring machines). The model has been validated against field data relative to a case study. The approach can be used in the early design process to identify tunnel boring machine characteristics and provide preliminary cost estimates. Additionally, during the construction phase, the method can be employed to interpret monitoring data and pre-design mitigation measures for unforeseen soil profile variations.

@en

Accurate evaluation of undrained shear strength of soils is crucial in geotechnical design and assessment. In the practice, undrained shear strength is obtained most frequently from CPT data, dividing the net cone tip resistance by a cone factor, 𝑁𝑁!". For organic soils, values between 8.6 and 15.3 are reported, depending on the stress history. The cone factor can be conditioned to the results of laboratory tests, although uncertainties remain on the variety of stress paths followed by the soil elements around the tip of the cone, compared to the ones tested in the laboratory. Non-uniqueness in the definition of the cone factor may lead to either unsafe or over-conservative choices, partly undermining both the reliability and the sustainability of the design. This contribution analyses numerically the inversion technique used to determine the undrained shear strength of organic clays, exploiting data from an extensive in situ and laboratory investigation. The adopted constitutive model was calibrated on the results of laboratory tests. Cone penetration tests were simulated performing coupled hydro-mechanical numerical analyses via G-PFEM, developed in the last decade at CIMNE-UPC. The role played by initial stress state and previous stress history upon stress distribution at failure, cone factor and sleeve friction is discussed. The numerical results suggest how the sleeve friction could be used to condition the cone factor depending on the over-consolidation ratio and demonstrate how combining the different available CPT readings with the aid of numerical results may reduce the uncertainty in the estimation of undrained shear strength.@en

Anchored wire meshes are commonly adopted to stabilize potentially unstable soil slopes. This reinforcement technique, employed either as an active or a passive anchoring system, is commonly designed according to ultimate limit state approaches. In this paper, an interaction model, useful for the design of anchored wire meshes, is proposed. The model is based on the results of a series of 3D large displacement finite element numerical analyses, in which the wire mesh mechanical behaviour is modelled as either an elastic or an elastic–plastic membrane. The model is inspired to standard load–displacement curves for shallow foundations, and the wire mesh presence is taken into account by suitably modifying the bearing capacity formula. The proposed model predictions are compared with experimental punching test results. The use of the model, only requiring the definition of geometry and soil–wire mesh mechanical properties, allows the pre-design of the reinforcement system without performing ad hoc finite element numerical analyses.

@en

Most of the bridges in Europe countries are now approaching their design life. Therefore, at present crucial is the choice of the most suitable retrofitting solution taking the current design standards into account. From an economic point of view the costs related to the foundations adaptation are not negligible at all, even because design approaches are in general over-conservative. For instance, in case of piled foundations, the presence of the raft is conventionally disregarded in the calculation of the pile group bearing capacity under general loading. In this work a pile group foundation embedded in a silty-clay soil stratum is studied to emphasise how the use of a non-standard approach may allow to make more sustainable the interventions. An extensive 3D pseudo-static finite element numerical analyses campaign, under general loading, accounting for the non-linear soil mechanical behaviour, was performed. The results were interpreted in terms of interaction domains for the piled foundation system (raft + piles).

@en

Cement-bentonite cut-off walls are commonly employed in geoenvironmental applications to limit ground water flow and pollutant transport. The wide diffusion of this artificial material in the current practice is not only due to its low permeability, but also to its simplicity of use. In this paper, experimental evidences about the role of curing on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of cement-bentonite mixtures are presented. Different curing times and curing conditions (representative for either water saturated or hydrocarbon polluted soils) have been considered, and their effects on both hydraulic conductivity and mechanical response in oedometer and triaxial conditions have been assessed. A unified hydro-mechanical framework, accounting for the changes of material fabric occurring with curing time and environment, is formulated. The hydraulic conductivity is very well predicted by a Kozeny-Carman like equation, whereas the mechanical behaviour is finely reproduced via an enhanced elastic–plastic constitutive model.

@en

Piled foundations are commonly employed to reduce settlements of artificial earth embankments on soft soil strata and geosynthetic reinforcements are installed at the embankment base to increase pile spacing and reduce construction costs. Despite the well-documented effectiveness of this technique, the mechanical processes, developing during the construction in the different elements constituting the ‘geo-structure’, are not fully understood and the design approaches are based on very simplified assumptions. They disregard the deformability of the various elements constituting the system and cannot be employed to estimate settlements. With the aim of introducing a displacement-based design approach to optimise the use of reinforcements and piles, in this article, the mechanical response of the system during the embankment construction is studied by means of large displacement non-linear finite difference numerical analyses, in which the geosynthetic reinforcement is modelled as an elastic membrane. The arching effect developing within the embankment body is described and the evolution of the process zone, where shear strains localise, is discussed. The global system response is described in terms of (i) average, (ii) differential settlements at the top of the embankment and (iii) maximum tensile force within the geosynthetic reinforcement.

@en

Most of the infrastructures in Europe are approaching their design life and, therefore, their safety under present conditions has to be reassessed. This is particularly crucial in the Italian context, since the current seismic design standards have significantly changed, being more severe than the previous ones. The goal of this paper is the critical evaluation of three different pseudo-static approaches for verifying at Ultimate Limit State a piled foundation of an existing bridge: (i) the standard one, neglecting the raft contribution and assuming foundation failure to be coincident with the failure of the most loaded pile, (ii) an analytical method, neglecting the raft contribution, but considering the ductile redistribution of forces on piles, (iii) a Finite Element numerical analysis, providing a push-over curve for the foundation system and considering both the raft-piles-soil coupling and the structural response of piles. The results deriving from the first two approaches suggest the necessity of retrofitting measures for the case considered. In contrast, the more sophisticated numerical approach, providing a significant insight in the mechanical response of the system, puts in evidence that, under its current conditions, the foundation does not necessitate neither geotechnical nor structural retrofitting measures. More generally, this paper shows that considering the raft presence may allow a more rational and sustainable design of piled foundations.

@en

Piled foundations are commonly employed to reduce settlements in artificial earth embankments founded on soft soil strata. To limit the number of piles and, consequently, construction costs, popular is the use of geosynthetic reinforcements laid at the embankment base. Nowadays, the complex interaction between geosynthetics, piles and soil is not yet fully understood and, in the scientific literature, simplified displacement-based approaches to choose reinforcements, pile diameter and spacing are missing. In this paper, the authors, starting from the critical analysis and theoretical interpretation of finite difference numerical results, introduce a new mathematical model to rapidly assess both (i) differential/average settlements at the top of the embankment and (ii) maximum tensile forces in the basal reinforcement. The model, conceived to reproduce the response of a pile belonging to the central part of the embankment, is the result of an upscaling procedure based on a suitable sub-structuring of the spatial domain (an axisymmetric unit cell) and on the concept of plane of equal settlements. For the foundation soil, drained conditions are considered, the pile skin roughness is disregarded, and piles are assumed to get the rigid bedrock. As generalised kinematic variables average and differential settlements are employed, whereas as generalized static ones the embankment height and the geosynthetic axial force. The model is validated against field measurements (where layered foundation soil and pile caps are included) and an application example of the model, used as a preliminary design tool in a displacement-based perspective, is finally provided.

@en

Seismic-induced liquefaction is one of the main hazards for pipelines buried in saturated granular materials. When soil is partially or completely fluidized, a lifeline, although installed in superficial trenches in which the coarse backfill soil usually is compacted, may experience a sudden uplift and damages. To reduce pipeline uplift and thus limit the associated risks, the authors propose a sustainable and original mitigation strategy, suitable for both existing and new lifelines, based on both the use of a geomembrane and the compaction of the soil surrounding the pipeline. According to the design method proposed, the intervention geometry is selected on the basis of the pipeline maximum admissible displacement, whereas the minimum required relative density can be designed, based on the site-specific seismic demand, to avoid cyclically induced local accumulation in excess pore-water pressure. To prove the effectiveness of this strategy, a series of 1-g small-scale laboratory tests was performed on a pipe buried in a fluidized sand layer. A simplified displacement-based design approach, which was validated against the experimental data, is proposed.

@en