Metal-air batteries, especially the Li-air and Zn-air ones, have garnered extensive attention and research efforts due to their high theoretical specific energy, safety, and environmental friendliness. Nevertheless, the sluggish kinetics of the cathodes is one of the key factors hindering their practical electrochemical performance. To address this issue, utilizing high-efficiency catalysts is a feasible and effective strategy. Among the varieties of catalysts reported, high-entropy alloys (HEAs) have emerged as a kind of promising catalyst due to their tunable composition and electronic structure. As a result, inspiring battery performances have been achieved in HEAs-catalyzed systems. In this review, we first summarize the reaction mechanism and challenges of the representative metal-air batteries, including Li-O₂, Li-CO₂, and Zn-air batteries, and then introduce the synthesis methods and core effects of HEAs. We also summarize some research progress on HEAs in these batteries. Finally, we offer insights into the future research prospects of HEAs in metal-air batteries.

Solid-state batteries currently receive ample attention due to their potential to outperform lithium-ion batteries in terms of energy density when featuring next-generation anodes such as lithium metal or silicon. One key remaining challenge is identifying solid electrolytes that combine high ionic conductivity with stability in contact with the highly reducing potentials of next-generation anodes. Fully reduced electrolytes, based on irreducible anions, offer a promising solution by avoiding electrolyte decomposition altogether. In this study, we demonstrate the compositional flexibility of the disordered antifluorite framework accessible by mechanochemical synthesis and leverage it to discover irreducible electrolytes with high ionic conductivities. We show that the recently investigated Li ₉N ₂Cl ₃ and Li ₅NCl ₂ phases are part of the same solid solution of Li-deficient antifluorite phases existing on the LiCl-Li ₃N tie line with a general chemical formula of Li _1+2xCl _1−xN _x (0.33 < x < 0.5). Using density functional theory calculations, we identify the origin of the 5-order-of-magnitude conductivity increase of the Li _1+2xCl _1−xN _x phases compared to the structurally related rock-salt LiCl phase. Finally, we demonstrate that S _Cl- and Br _Cl-substituted analogues of the Li _1+2xCl _1−xN _x phases may be synthesized, enabling significant conductivity improvements by a factor of 10, reaching 0.2 mS cm ⁻¹ for Li _2.31S _0.41Br _0.14N _0.45. This investigation demonstrates for the first time that irreducible antifluorite-like phases are compositionally highly modifiable; this finding lays the ground for discovery of new compositions of irreducible antifluorite-like phases with even further increased conductivities, which could help eliminate solid-electrolyte decomposition and decomposition-induced Li losses on the anode side in high-performance next-generation batteries.

The interlaboratory comparability and reproducibility of all-solid-state battery cell cycling performance are poorly understood due to the lack of standardized set-ups and assembly parameters. This study quantifies the extent of this variability by providing commercially sourced battery materials—LiNi_0.6Mn_0.2Co_0.2O₂ for the positive electrode, Li₆PS₅Cl as the solid electrolyte and indium for the negative electrode—to 21 research groups. Each group was asked to use their own cell assembly protocol but follow a specific electrochemical protocol. The results show large variability in assembly and electrochemical performance, including differences in processing pressures, pressing durations and In-to-Li ratios. Despite this, an initial open circuit voltage of 2.5 and 2.7 V vs Li⁺/Li is a good predictor of successful cycling for cells using these electroactive materials. We suggest a set of parameters for reporting all-solid-state battery cycling results and advocate for reporting data in triplicate.

Li₃YX₆(X = Cl, Br) materials are Li-ion conductors that can be used as solid electrolytes in all solid-state batteries. Solid electrolytes ideally have high ionic conductivity and (electro)chemical compatibility with the electrodes. It was proven that introducing Br to Li₃YCl₆increases ionic conductivity but, according to thermodynamic calculations, should also reduce oxidative stability. In this paper, the trade-off between ionic conductivity and electrochemical stability in Li₃YBr_xCl_6-xhalogen-substituted compounds is investigated. The compositions of Li₃YBr_1.5Cl_4.5and Li₃YBr_4.5Cl_1.5are reported for the first time, along with a consistent analysis of the whole Li₃YBr_xCl_6-x(x = 0-6) tie-line. The results show that, while Br-rich materials are more conductive (5.36 × 10^-3S/cm at 30 °C for x = 4.5), the oxidative stability is lower (∼ 3 V compared to ∼ 3.5 V). Small Br content (x = 1.5) does not affect oxidative stability but substantially increases ionic conductivity compared to pristine Li₃YCl₆(2.1 compared to 0.049 × 10^-3S/cm at 30 °C). This work highlights that optimization of substitutions in the anion framework provide prolific and rational avenues for tailoring the properties of solid electrolytes.

Solid-state lithium-metal batteries are considered to be promising candidates for next-generation high-energy density storage devices to power electrical vehicles. Critical challenges for solid-state lithium-metal batteries include the large morphological changes associated with the plating and stripping of lithium metal and decomposition of the solid electrolyte, because of the reductive nature of the lithium metal, both increasing the lithium metal-solid electrolyte interface resistance. This is especially challenging when starting in the discharged state with a bare anode or "anode-less"current collector facing the solid electrolyte. To overcome this, a 100-nm thin layer of ZnO is deposited on the copper current collector with atomic layer deposition (ALD). During the first charge, this results in more homogeneous lithium-metal growth, rationalized by the formation of a Zn-Li alloy that acts as seed crystals for the lithium metal. The resulting more homogeneous lithium-metal growth maintains better contact with the solid electrolyte, leading to more reversible cycling of lithium metal. Minor prelithiating of the ZnO/Cu anode with 1 mAh/cm2 further improves the cycling performance, as demonstrated in a full all-solid-state cell using LiFePO4 as a cathode, resulting in an average Coulombic efficiency of >95%. These findings mark the first steps in an interface strategy to overcome the challenges at the solid electrolyte/lithium-metal interface in solid-state lithium-metal batteries.

The development of safe and high-performance Li-metal anodes is crucial to meet the demanded increase in energy density of batteries. However, severe reactivity of Li metal with typical electrolytes and dendrite formation leads to a poor cycle life and safety concerns. Therefore, it is essential to develop electrolytes that passivate the reactivity toward Li metal and suppress dendrite formation. Carbonate electrolytes display severe reactivity toward Li metal; however, they are preferred above the more volatile ether-based electrolytes. Here, a carbonate electrolyte gel polymer approach is combined with LiNO₃ as an additive to stabilize Li-metal plating. This electrolyte design strategy is systematically monitored by operando neutron depth profiling (NDP) to follow the evolution of the plated Li-metal density and the inactive lithium in the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) during cycling. Individually, the application of the LiNO₃ electrolyte additive and the gel polymer approach are shown to be effective. Moreover, when used in conjunction, the effects are complementary in increasing the plated Li density, reducing inactive Li species, and reducing the overpotentials. The LiNO₃ additive leads to more compact plating; however, it results in a significant buildup of inactive Li species in a double-layer SEI structure, which challenges the cell performance over longer cycling. In contrast, the gel polymer strongly suppresses the buildup of inactive Li species by immobilizing the carbonate electrolyte species; however, the plating is less dense and occurs with a significant overpotential. Combining the LiNO₃ additive with the gel polymer approach results in a thin and homogeneous SEI with a high conductivity through the presence of Li₃N and a limited buildup of inactive Li species over cycling. Through this approach, even high plating capacities, reaching 7 mAh/cm², can be maintained at a high efficiency. The rational design strategy, empowered by monitoring the Li-density evolution, demonstrates the possibilities of achieving stable operation of Li metal in carbonate-based electrolytes.

In common hybrid solid electrolytes (HSEs), either the ionic conductivity of the polymer electrolyte is enhanced by the presence of a nanosized inorganic filler, which effectively decrease the glass-transition temperature, or the polymer solid electrolyte acts mostly as a flexible host for the inorganic solid electrolyte, the latter providing the conductivity. Here a true HSE is developed that makes optimal use of the high conductivity of the inorganic solid electrolyte and the flexibility of the polymer matrix. It is demonstrated that the LAGP (Li_1.5Al_0.5Ge_1.5(PO₄)₃) participates in the overall conductivity and that the interface environment between the poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and LAGP plays a key role in utilizing the high conductivity of the LAGP. This HSE demonstrates promising cycling versus Li-metal anodes and in a full Li-metal solid-state battery. This strategy offers a promising route for the development of Li-metal solid-state batteries, aiming for safe and reversible high-energy-density batteries.