PURPOSE: Platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors are key components of systemic treatment for muscle-invasive and advanced urothelial cancer. The ideal integration of these two treatment modalities remains unclear as clinical trials have led to inconsistent results. Modulation of the tumor-immune microenvironment by chemotherapy is poorly characterized. We aimed to investigate this modulation, focusing on potential clinical implications for immune checkpoint inhibitor response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We assessed immune cell densities, spatial relations, and tumor/stromal components from 116 patients with urothelial bladder cancer (paired data for 95 patients) before and after platinum-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: Several published biomarkers for immunotherapy response changed upon chemotherapy treatment. The intratumoral CD8+ T-cell percentage increased after treatment and was associated with increased TNFα-via-NF-κB signaling. The percentage of PDL1+ immune cells was higher after chemotherapy. An increase in chemo-induced changes that potentially inhibit an antitumor immune response was also observed, including increased fibroblast-based TGFβ signaling and distances from immune cells to the nearest cancer cell. The latter two parameters correlated significantly in posttreatment samples, suggesting that TGFβ signaling in fibroblasts may play a role in spatially separating immune cells from cancer cells. We examined specific chemotherapy regimens and found that treatment with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was associated with an increase in the macrophage cell percentage. Gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy was associated with upregulation of fibroblast TGFβ signaling. CONCLUSIONS: The opposing effects of platinum-based chemotherapy on the immune cell composition and stromal context of the tumor-immune microenvironment may explain the inconsistent results of clinical trials investigating chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in bladder cancer.

Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy is recommended for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). It has been shown that somatic deleterious mutations in ERCC2, gain-of-function mutations in ERBB2, and alterations in ATM, RB1, and FANCC are correlated with pathological response to NAC in MIBC. The objective of this study was to validate these genomic biomarkers in pretreatment transurethral resection material from an independent retrospective cohort of 165 patients with MIBC who subsequently underwent NAC and radical surgery. Patients with ypT0/Tis/Ta/T1N0 disease after surgery were defined as responders. Somatic deleterious mutations in ERCC2 were found in nine of 68 (13%) evaluable responders and two of 95 (2%) evaluable nonresponders (p = 0.009; FDR = 0.03). No correlation was observed between response and alterations in ERBB2 or in ATM, RB1, or FANCC alone or in combination. In an exploratory analysis, no additional genomic alterations discriminated between responders and nonresponders to NAC. No further associations were identified between the aforementioned biomarkers and pathological complete response (ypT0N0) after surgery. In conclusion, we observed a positive association between deleterious mutations in ERCC2 and pathological response to NAC, but not overall survival or recurrence-free survival. Other previously reported genomic biomarkers were not validated. Patient summary: It is currently unknown which patients will respond to chemotherapy before definitive surgery for bladder cancer. Previous studies described several gene mutations in bladder cancer that correlated with chemotherapy response. This study confirmed that patients with bladder cancer with a mutation in the ERCC2 gene often respond to chemotherapy.

The authors regret that the following statement regarding author contributions was missed: Kristan van der Vos is currently a Scientific Editor for Cell Reports Medicine, which is published by Elsevier. Dr van der Vos was not involved in the peer-review process or editorial discussions about this manuscript. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.