Comparative Analysis of Coupled and Uncoupled 3D Finite Elements Models for Masonry Structures Subjected to Settlements

Abstract

In the Netherlands, subsidence due to different causes is linked to damage to the ubiquitous masonry structures. Finite element (FE) analyses can be used to assess the response of the structures subjected to settlements. This paper presents the comparison between three-dimensional FE modelling strategies to investigate the response of an unreinforced masonry building on a strip foundation. The aim is to investigate whether different modelling approaches demonstrate consistent results. The soil-structure system is modelled employing two strategies: a coupled model, in which the structure is tied to the soil volume, and an uncoupled approach that divides the soil and structure into two sub-systems. Two displacement fields, imposed at the bottom of the soil volume, idealize various shapes of the subsidence troughs, with increasing intensity measured by their distortion. Non-linear interfaces are used to simulate the soil-foundation interaction, and their stiffness values vary based on the type of model. The displacements, interface stresses and crack patterns of the selected modelling strategies are consistent. The interface types do not influence the response of the façade, whereas the shape of the settlement does play a key role. The uncoupled models exhibit, on average, slightly higher values of damage than coupled models for a given imposed distortion. The two modelling strategies require almost the same computational time and show similar convergence. Because of the limited contribution of small soil volumes in uncoupled models, the superstructure sub-system can be directly utilized to assess the response of structures undergoing vertical displacements, thereby reducing the modelling burden.