Axial vibratory driving installation effects on the monopile response to cyclic lateral loading

Abstract

In response to the urgent need for sustainable energy sources to combat climate change, offshore wind power has emerged as a promising solution. However, the installation process of offshore wind turbines, particularly the driving of monopile foundations, presents challenges, notably concerning underwater noise pollution and its environmental impacts. This research studies the efficacy of an alternative approach to traditional installation methods: the vibratory pile driving, renowned for its minimized noise impact. It focuses on its effects on the long-term performance of monopiles under cyclic lateral loading, through numerical simulations. By addressing certain uncertainties, the aim of this work is to contribute to optimizing offshore wind turbine installation practices and ensuring the stability and performance of monopile foundations in challenging marine environments.

Two models are integrated and merged to address the previous objectives. The first model simulates the dynamic behaviour of the soil after vibratory installation effects. Meanwhile, the second model analyzes monopile response to lateral loading induced by environmental factors like wind and waves. The OpenSees software is employed for the computation of 3D finite element analyses, and the soil, represented as dry, initially dense, Karlsruhe fine sand, is modeled using the SANISAND constitutive model, which relies on the Critical State Soil Mechanics framework, to accurately capture stress and state-dependent behaviour. Only half of the monopile's embedment depth is evaluated, due to computational constraints.

Both the behaviour of the soil after the vibro-installation process and after the lateral loading are evaluated. Significant vertical and radial displacement occurs during pile driving, leading to settlement around the pile shaft and mudline as soil densify. Horizontal displacement patterns indicate an initial outward movement followed by lateral drawing-in towards the pile shaft, driven by soil compaction and rearrangement induced by installation vibrations. Notably, post-installation, there is a marked increase in relative density around the pile shaft, enhancing soil strength and friction, particularly near the pile tip. This densification, along with changes in mean effective stress, significantly affects soil behaviour and sets the stage for subsequent lateral loading.

After the lateral loading stage, the influence of installation on pile response becomes apparent. Post-installation soil conditions profoundly impact lateral displacement patterns, with vibro-installed piles exhibiting larger displacements during initial loading cycles compared to wished-in-place piles. Throughout lateral loading cycles, localized soil densification and remoulding further influence stiffness and displacement patterns. Notably, the relative density changes reflect these alterations, showing the intricate interplay between installation effects and lateral loading response. Overall, the results emphasize the necessity of considering installation processes in predicting pile behaviour accurately.

While this study provides valuable insights into the behaviour of piles in dry sand conditions, it also underscores several limitations that necessitate further research. Future investigations should address these limitations to provide more robust insights into the behaviour of offshore wind monopiles and inform more effective design and installation practices in the renewable energy sector.