Resolving vorticity and dissipation in a turbulent boundary layer by tomographic PTV and VIC+

Journal article (2017)

Authors

J.F.G. Schneiders Aerodynamics - Aerospace Engineering
F. Scarano Flow Physics and Technology
G.E. Elsinga Fluid Mechanics - Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering
Research Group
Aerodynamics (Aerospace Engineering) (TU Delft)
Copyright: © 2017 J.F.G. Schneiders, F. Scarano, G.E. Elsinga
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2318-x
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

2017

Language

English

Faculty

Aerospace Engineering

Department

Flow Physics and Technology

Research Group

Aerodynamics

Abstract

The existing time-resolved tomographic particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements by Jodai and Elsinga (J Fluid Mech 795:611–633; Jodai, Elsinga, J Fluid Mech 795:611–633, 2016) in a turbulent boundary layer (Reθ = 2038) are reprocessed using tomographic particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) and vortex-in-cell-plus (VIC+). The resulting small-scale flow properties, i.e. vorticity and turbulence dissipation, are compared. The VIC+ technique was recently proposed and uses the concept of pouring time into space to increase reconstruction quality of instantaneous velocity. The tomographic PTV particle track measurements are interpolated using VIC+ to a dense grid, making use of both particle velocity and Lagrangian acceleration. Comparison of the vortical structures by visualization of isosurfaces of vorticity magnitude shows that the two methods return similar coherent vortical structures, but their strength in terms of vorticity magnitude is increased when using VIC+, which suggests an improvement in spatial resolution. Further statistical evaluation shows that the root mean square (rms) of vorticity fluctuations from tomographic PIV is approximately 40% lower in comparison to a reference profile available from a DNS simulation, while the VIC+ technique returns rms vorticity fluctuations to within 10% of the reference. The dissipation rate is heavily underestimated by tomographic PIV with approximately 50% damping, whereas the VIC+ analysis yields a dissipation rate to within approximately 5% for y+ > 25. The fact that dissipation can be directly measured by a volumetric experiment is novel. It differs from existing approaches that involve 2d measurements combined with isotropic turbulence assumptions or apply corrections based on sub-grid scale turbulence modelling. Finally, the study quantifies the spatial response of VIC+ with a sine-wave lattice analysis. The results indicate a twofold increase of spatial resolution with respect to cross-correlation interrogation.