Names are essential for structuring and reason-ing about programs. However, the implementation of names differs across many programming lan-guages. There is an bundance of choice between various implementation techniques with regards to name-binding techniques. As such, when design-ing a programming language it is not clear which technique one should choose. This paper attempts to give an exhaustive overview of the various tech-niques that exist, compares them on properties such as alpha-equivalence, ease of implementation and enforcing well-scopedness. Furthermore, the pos-sibility of a one-fits-all solution is explored.