This study investigates the aerodynamic and acoustic response of a multi-orifice acoustic liner grazed by a planar acoustic wave and turbulent flow, at centerline Mach number equal to 0.32. High-fidelity flow simulations are carried out using a Lattice-Boltzmann Very-LargeEddy-Simulation solver and the in-situ technique is used to calculate impedance. The triple decomposition technique is adopted to separate the mean-flow effects from those due to grazing tonal acoustic waves with different frequencies and amplitudes. This study highlights the sensitivity of in-situ measurements on the position of the face-sheet probe used to sample the unsteady pressure fluctuations. It is found that the resistance changes up to a factor of three along each cavity. The acoustic-induced velocity field reveals the intricate interaction between the acoustic waves and the turbulent flow. It is shown that the wake shed by the upstream cavity impacts the downstream one, affecting the spatial distribution and the amplitude of the acoustic-induced velocity within the orifice. Furthermore, a vortex within the hole is observed; it is found that its impact on resistance depends on the acoustic wave propagation with respect to the mean flow.

@en

Eduction methods are adopted to characterize acoustic liners. In this paper, several impedance eduction techniques are compared using a numerical database obtained with scale resolved lattice-Boltzmann simulations of a reference acoustic liner in the presence or not of a grazing turbulent flow. Three impedance eduction techniques are compared: an inverse approach based on the Mode-Matching (MM) method, the straightforward method based on the Prony-like Kumaresan-Tufts (KT) algorithm, and one approach based on a minimization problem between reference measurements and the solution of the Pierce’s equation. Furthermore, the educed impedance is compared with the one obtained using local impedance measurements with the Dean’s method with virtual probes located on the entire face-sheet. Results show that impedance values obtained with the Deans’ method are highly dependent on the sampling location and that they vary largely over each cavity. Results from the eduction methods are similar amongst them with few discrepancies found for the method based on the Pierce’s equation. In particular, the highest value of resistance obtained using the Deans’ method is similar to the one obtained using the KT and MM eduction methods.@en