Nuclear energy has found widespread application in navies across the globe. This thesis explores the potential integration of generation IV (very) Small Modular Reactor (SMR) technology for future surface combatants, focusing on the Very High-Temperature Reactor modelled as vSMR and a Molten Salt Reactor as SMR. The design impact of using generation IV (v)SMR technology for power generation on future surface combatants was unexplored. An estimation of future power and energy requirements and a detailed investigation of the reactor compartment is performed. It includes shielding, power generation, distribution, and conversion systems. Emerging naval-directed energy weapons and advanced sensor technologies are implemented to position the combatant within the spectrum of future mission capabilities.
A sizing model evaluates the feasibility of (v)SMR integration in terms of power, energy, volume, and weight. An indication of the available weight for (v)SMR technology is searched by iterating over the displacement of future surface combatants. For the defined future surface combatant, naval SMR power plants are compatible in terms of weight with conventional all-electric gas turbine-driven combatants with displacements above 8,000 tonnes. The model reveals that vSMR technology faces significant challenges related to weight despite its potential benefits in terms of redundancy and modularity. For combatants up to 16,000 tonnes, naval vSMR power plants are not viable due to their substantial weight and space requirements, primarily driven by the need for extensive shielding. Increasing the power output per vSMR reduces the required shielding and provides an alternative solution.
A case study explores a preliminary design of a future surface combatant with a displacement of 9,800 tonnes. The study suggests that the propulsion demand significantly impacts the size of the power plant. This results in the need for energy storage systems that manage variable power demands, particularly for SMR technology integrated into large surface combatants. Unlike vSMR naval power plants, SMR technology is comparable in size to the all-electric gas turbine power plant of conventional surface combatants.
The study assesses the effectiveness of the preliminary design in terms of survivability, mobility, range and endurance. It is estimated after capability prioritisation that (v)SMR technology and conventional gas turbine configurations have an equivalent survivability impact. A critical trade-off is highlighted between enhanced endurance and range against challenges, such as an increase in weight, volume requirements, and compromises in mobility compared to conventional gas turbine systems. The choice between SMR and vSMR technologies further complicates this balance by choosing between compactness and load response. A essential conclusion is that generation IV (v)SMR technology can enhance a future surface combatant's autonomy and future power load capabilities without compromising its effectiveness.
The Royal Netherlands Navy can use the results as an indicative substantiation for developing generation IV (v)SMR-powered future surface combatants. Moreover, it can help initiate a future naval capability plan and contribute to the realisation of generation IV (v)SMR power generation for the maritime sector.