The miombo woodland is the largest dry woodland formation in sub-Saharan Africa, covering an estimated area of 2.7–3.6 million km2. Compared to other global ecosystems, the miombo woodland demonstrates unique interactions between plant phenology and climate. For instance, it experiences an increase in the leaf area index (LAI) during the dry season. However, due to limited surface exchange observations in the miombo region, there is a lack of information regarding the effect of these properties on miombo woodland evaporation. It is crucial to have a better understanding of miombo evaporation for accurate hydrological and climate modelling in this region. Currently, the only available regional evaporation estimates are based on satellite data. However, the accuracy of these estimates is questionable due to the scarcity of field estimates with which to compare. Therefore, this study aims to compare the temporal dynamics and magnitudes of six satellite-based evaporation estimates – the Topography-driven Flux Exchange (FLEX-Topo) model, Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM), Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) MOD16 product, operational Simplified Surface Energy Balance (SSEBop) model, Thornthwaite–Mather climatic Water Balance (TerraClimate) dataset, and Water Productivity through Open access of Remotely sensed derived data (WaPOR) – during different phenophases in the miombo woodland of the Luangwa Basin, a representative river basin in southern Africa. The goal of this comparison is to determine if the temporal dynamics and magnitudes of the satellite-based evaporation estimates align with the documented feedback between miombo woodland and climate. In the absence of basin-scale field observations, actual evaporation estimates based on the multi-annual water balance (Ewb) are used for comparison. The results show significant discrepancies among the satellite-based evaporation estimates during the dormant and green-up and mid-green-up phenophases. These phenophases involve substantial changes in miombo species' canopy phenology, including the co-occurrence of leaf fall and leaf flush, as well as access to deeper moisture stocks to support leaf flush in preparation for the rainy season. The satellite-based evaporation estimates show the highest agreement during the senescence phenophase, which corresponds to the period of high temperature, high soil moisture, high leaf chlorophyll content, and highest LAI (i.e. late rainy season into the cool-dry season). In comparison to basin-scale actual evaporation, all six satellite-based evaporation estimates appear to underestimate evaporation. Satellite-based evaporation estimates do not accurately represent evaporation in this data-sparse region, which has a phenology and seasonality that significantly differ from the typical case in data-rich ground-truth locations. This may also be true for other locations with limited data coverage. Based on this study, it is crucial to conduct field-based observations of evaporation during different miombo species phenophases to improve satellite-based evaporation estimates in miombo woodlands.@en

The rapid development of free and open-access hydrological models and coupling framework tools continues to present more opportunities for coupled model development for improved assessment of floodplain hydrology. In this study, we set up an Upper Zambezi hydrological model and a fully spatially hydrological-hydrodynamic coupled model for the Barotse Floodplain using GLOFRIM (GLObally applicable computational FRamework for Integrated hydrological– hydrodynamic Modelling). The hydrological and hydrodynamic models used are WFLOW and LISFLOOD-FP, respectively. The simulated flows generated by the wflow model for the upstream gauge stations before the Barotse Floodplain were quite similar and closely matched the observed flow as indicated by the evaluation statistics; Chavuma, nse = 0.738; kge = 0.738; pbias = 2.561 and RSR = 0.511; Watopa, nse = 0.684; kge = 0.816; pbias = 10.577 and RSR = 0.557; and Lukulu, nse = 0.736; kge = 0.795; pbias = 10.437 and RSR = 0.509. However, even though the wflow hydrological model was able to simulate the upstream hydrology very well, the results at the floodplain outlet gauge stations did not quite match the observed monthly flows at Senanga gauge station as indicated by the evaluation statistics: nse = 0.132; kge = 0.509; pbias = 37.740 and RSR = 0.9233. This is mainly because the representation of both floodplain channel hydrodynamics and vertical hydrological processes is necessary to correctly capture floodplain dynamics. Thus, the need for an approach that saves as a basis for developing fully spatially distributed coupled hydrodynamic and hydraulic models’ assessments for groundwater dependent tropical floodplains such as the Barotse floodplain, in closing the gap between hydrology and hydrodynamics in floodplain assessments. A fully coupled model has the potential to be used in implementing adaptive wetland management strategies for water resources allocation, environmental flow (eflows), flood control, land use and climate change impact assessments.

@en

Floodplain wetlands are a fundamental part of the African continent’s ecosystem and serve as habitat for fish and wildlife species, biodiversity, and micro-organisms that support life. It is generally recognised that wetlands are and remain fragile ecosystems that should be subject to sustainable conservation and management through the use of sustainable tools. In this paper, we propose a synthesis of the state of art concerning coupled hydrologic and hydraulic models for floodplains assessments in Africa. Case studies reviewed in this paper have pointed out the potential of applying coupled hydrologic and hydraulic models and the opportunities present to be used in Africa especially for data scarce and large basin for floodplain assessments through the use of available open access models, coupling frameworks and remotely sensed datasets. To our knowledge this is the first case study review of this kind on this topic. A Hydrological model coupled with Hydraulic Model of the floodplain provides improvements in floodplain model simulations and hence better information for floodplain management. Consequently, this would lead to improved decision-making and planning of adaption and mitigation measures for sound floodplain wetland management plans and programmes especially with the advent of climate change and variability.

@en