Self-aggregating calix[4]arenes carrying four DOTA ligands on the upper rim for stable complexation of paramagnetic GdIII-ions have already been proposed as MRI probes. In this work, we investigate the luminescence properties of TbIII-DOTA-calix[4]arene-4OPr containing four propyl-groups and compare them with those of the analog substituted with a phthalimide chromophore (TbIII-DOTA-calix[4]arene-3OPr-OPhth). We show that, given its four aromatic rings, the calix[4]arene core acts as an effective sensitizer of Tb-centered luminescence. Substituents on the lower rim can modulate the aggregation behavior, which in turn determines the luminescence properties of the compounds. In solid state, the quantum yield of the phthalimide derivative is almost three times as high as that of the propyl-functionalized analog demonstrating a beneficial role of the chromophore on Tb-luminescence. In solution, however, the effect of the phthalimide group vanishes, which we attribute to the large distance between the chromophore and the lanthanide, situated on the opposite rims of the calix[4]arene. Both quantum yields and luminescence lifetimes show clear concentration dependence in solution, related to the strong impact of aggregation on the luminescence behavior. We also evidence the variability in the values of the critical micelle concentration depending on the experimental technique. Such luminescent calix[4]arene platforms accommodating stable lanthanide complexes can be considered valuable building blocks for the design of dual MR/optical imaging probes.@en

Protein-DNA complexes are one of the principal barriers the replisome encounters during replication. One such barrier is the Tus-ter complex, which is a direction dependent barrier for replication fork progression. The details concerning the dynamics of the replisome when encountering these Tus-ter barriers in the cell are poorly understood. By performing quantitative fluorescence microscopy with microfuidics, we investigate the effect on the replisome when encountering these barriers in live Escherichia coli cells. We make use of an E. coli variant that includes only an ectopic origin of replication that is positioned such that one of the two replisomes encounters a Tus-ter barrier before the other replisome. This enables us to single out the effect of encountering a Tus-ter roadblock on an individual replisome. We demonstrate that the replisome remains stably bound after encountering a Tus-ter complex from the non-permissive direction. Furthermore, the replisome is only transiently blocked, and continues replication beyond the barrier. Additionally, we demonstrate that these barriers affect sister chromosome segregation by visualizing specific chromosomal loci in the presence and absence of the Tus protein. These observations demonstrate the resilience of the replication fork to natural barriers and the sensitivity of chromosome alignment to fork progression.@en

All living organisms pass on their genetic information to their offspring in the form of DNA or RNA molecules by duplicating them across generations. In the bacteria, their genes are packed in long chains of DNA molecules or chromosomes. One of the widely studied model organisms, Escherichia coli, replicates its circular chromosome in two directions starting from an origin region of chromosome with independent replication complexes or replisomes simultaneously synthesizing the daughter chromosomes. DNA replication is an important process of the E. coli life cycle because of occurrence of small errors in its mechanism will affect the cell’s normal state larger. Much of our current knowledge about the dynamics of replisome complex has been obtained from in vitro experiments. However, the natural environment of the cell is considerably different from that of in vitro solutions.@en

Niet eerder opgevoerd@en

Background: Chromosome engineering encompasses a collection of homologous recombination-based techniques that are employed to modify the genome of a model organism in a controlled fashion. Such techniques are widely used in both fundamental and industrial research to introduce multiple insertions in the same Escherichia coli strain. To date, λ-Red recombination (also known as recombineering) and P1 phage transduction are the most successfully implemented chromosome engineering techniques in E. coli. However, due to errors that can occur during the strain creation process, reliable validation methods are essential upon alteration of a strain's chromosome. Results and discussion: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods and DNA sequence analysis are rapid and powerful methods to verify successful integration of DNA sequences into a chromosome. Even though these verification methods are necessary, they may not be sufficient in detecting all errors, imposing the requirement of additional validation methods. For example, as extraneous insertions may occur during recombineering, we highlight the use of Southern blotting to detect their presence. These unwanted mutations can be removed via transducing the region of interest into the wild type chromosome using P1 phages. However, in doing so one must verify that both the P1 lysate and the strains utilized are free from contamination with temperate phages, as these can lysogenize inside a cell as a large plasmid. Thus, we illustrate various methods to probe for temperate phage contamination, including cross-streak agar and Evans Blue-Uranine (EBU) plate assays, whereby the latter is a newly reported technique for this purpose in E. coli. Lastly, we discuss methodologies for detecting defects in cell growth and shape characteristics, which should be employed as an additional check. Conclusion: The simple, yet crucial validation techniques discussed here can be used to reliably verify any chromosomally engineered E. coli strains for errors such as non-specific insertions in the chromosome, temperate phage contamination, and defects in growth and cell shape. While techniques such as PCR and DNA sequence verification should standardly be performed, we illustrate the necessity of performing these additional assays. The discussed techniques are highly generic and can be easily applied to any type of chromosome engineering.@en