This research focuses on a new system for nourishing the Dutch coast with sand, which utilizes semi-autonomous sailing barges and an electrical crawler to continuously replenish the beach. Yearly, the Dutch government grants contracts to nourish the Dutch coast with volumes around 10.000.000 m$^3$. The Dutch dune coast protects the low part of the Netherlands against inundation from the North sea. This sand is dredged by Trailer Suction Hopper Dredgers (TSHD) on a depth of 20 m and transported to the coast. This transport causes a CO2 emission of about 190 kilo tonne a year. As emissions are expected to grow with increasing sea levels the Dutch government looks for ways to improve the high-energy demanding strategy that is currently used. Sweco introduced the Slow Sailing, and believes in the energy reducing concept and therefore initiates this further research. The general idea of this concept is to reduce the energy demand and emissions associated with traditional sand nourishment practices by using multiple barges that sail slowly and continuously nourish the Dutch coast. The aim of this research is to concretize this concept, in which feasibility of the system compared with energy, emission and cost calculations are central. To achieve this goal, the Slow Sailing system is compared to the traditional trailer suction hopper dredger, currently used for sand nourishment in the Netherlands. The comparison is based on a scenario in the Northsea. This leads to the main research question: What is the gain in energy consumption, emissions and cost for the Slow Sailing concept compared to classical nourishment strategies? In order to achieve this goal a review of current sand nourishment strategies was conducted. Next, the OpenTNSim model was adapted to perform energy calculations and enable a comparison of energy demands and emissions between the new system and the traditional trailer suction hopper dredger. Finally, a cost evaluation was conducted to compare the cost per cubic meter of sand for a 1.000.000 cubic meter nourishment project at the Egmond aan Zee nearshore in the Netherlands.

Compared to the traditional trailer suction hopper dredger, the Slow Sailing system showed a significant factor 15 decrease in energy demand in the sailing component of the dredging cycle. The Slow Sailing system with barges of 1500 m$^3$ was found to be the most energy-efficient and cost-effective option, with an estimated project cost of 3.00 euro/m$^3$, while the TSHD with 4280 m$^3$ was found to be the cheapest option, with an estimated project cost of 2.55 euro/m$^3$. In terms of CO2 emissions, the Slow Sailing system emitted significantly less CO2 compared to the TSHD, with a difference of 1000 tonnes CO2+ emission in a one million cubic meter dredging project. Overall, the results suggest that the Slow Sailing system is a more energy-efficient and environmentally-friendly option for sand nourishment of the Dutch coast.

Fieldwork Hydraulic Engineering’ is a course given at Delft University of Technology for the MSc Hydraulic Engineering. In collaboration with local experts Boyan Savov and Traian Marin, a team of 8 students guided by Mark Voorendt was sent to investigate the local conditions at Asparuhovo beach in Varna, Bulgaria, for purely educational purposes. Before 2019, Asparuhovo beach used to have a stable coastline with some seasonal variations. However in 2019, the Karantinata port was constructed and disturbed the equilibrium state of the beach. Rapid sedimentation occurred near the port and the port entrance. Due to this excessive sedimentation near the port entrance, the fishing port has lost almost all of its intended functionality, as minimum water depths in the port entrance approach 0.3m. The port was originally designed for larger fishing boats, which are currently not able to enter and making the port lose functionality. It is yet unknown how this sedimentation trend is formed with the construction of the fishing port. The main objective of the research was to examine the current sedimentation near Karantinata port by executing a measuring campaign during the Hydraulic Fieldwork and by setting up a 5 year monitoring program for the marine environment. By doing so, the processes which lead to sedimentation can be understood and a model can be made. With this model, adjustments to the port layout can be examined which are potentially needed for the port to operate at full functionality. To tackle these problems, the students performed the fieldwork. With 2 days of beach and foreshore measurements the research question was assessed. With the acquired data of the system, supported by additional lab sieving analysis, data processing and modelling in Delft, the students formed theories on the origin of the sedimentation problem. With these insights, recommendations for the area can be suggested. The measurements are performed on multiple locations and at each location multiple variables were researched. For Asparuhovo beach and foreshore these are the bathymetry, waterline position, wave climate, beach profile, sediment characteristics and ecology. At the fishing port Karantinata these are the port characteristics such as functions, planning and infrastructure, port entrance, bathymetry and breakwater design. At the Asparuhovo breakwater it is the top protection layer, damage assessment and measures of improvement. At Veteran beach this is the soil samples for grain size distribution. At Martsiana quarry the length to thickness ratio, blockiness were researched, as well as the diameter to check if potentially suitable for breakwater material. With this information, a preliminary model in Delft3D has been set up with the land boundaries, grid and bathymetry file. With knowledge of the coastal processes and the processed data, potential causes of sedimentation are speculated on. It is unlikely that such large amounts of sediment are coming from outside of Asparuhovo beach system, as there are no sediment rich rivers nearby, the sedimentation occurred in a very short period of two years and the sediment would mostly not be able to cross the deep navigation channel as it would settle due to lower flow velocities. It is expected that large parts of the settled sediment near the port entrance is from the beach itself. This is also more likely due to the two closed boundaries of the beach, the Asparuhovo breakwater and the Karantinata port. This was checked by analyzing the grain size diameter compared to other locations at the beach and looking at the waterline developments. It was found that the grain size at the middle of the beach was 1.8 mm and at the port entrance between 0.2 and 0.3 mm. It was suspected that the fine sediments of the middle of the beach are eroded and deposited at the port entrance as the sediment can settle at the Southeastern part behind the port breakwater due to sheltered conditions. The mechanisms that could have induced this are: rip currents, longshore currents and the different wave patterns. To examine and validate these findings, a monitoring plan for the coming 5 years is proposed. This is very important to create an understanding of the systems parameters and behaviour. Without monitoring, adjustments to the port cannot be tested in a correctly calibrated model. The parameters which need continuous measurement are the wave parameters, sea level measurements and visual beach observations. Biannual measurements are needed for currents, hydrographic works, visual observations with a drone, bathymetry and sediment parameters. Before the port is fully operational again, the port entrance needs dredging. This can be done in this time span of 5 years to ensure the passage of fishing boats. After dredging a short survey of the area needs to be performed to incorporate the changes into the model. These are the bathymetric survey, visual observations and sediment samples all around the dredging area. There are three potential solutions incorporated in the report, which can be modelled with the findings of the monitoring plan. The first potential solution to make the port fully operational again is relocating the port entrance with a curved breakwater stretching into the sea. The second solution is a combination of the entrance relocation and water flow through the port. The third is a blocking groyne stretching from Asparuhovo beach into the sea, blocking the sedimentation going into the port entrance. For all these potential solutions, dredging works are needed to reensure the required water depth for the vessel draught. The least costly and most promising is the relocation of the port entrance design. It can be noted that continuous dredging is not a sustainable solution as the sedimentation keeps occurring near the port entrance as the hydrodynamic conditions will not change. It is recommended to first find the source of the settled sediment by comparing control volumes of sediment on the beach over the years. Then a model should be set up of the Asparuhovo beach and foreshore and Karantinata port to give insights in the processes. This model needs to be validated and calibrated with input from a monitoring campaign. With a working model, the causes of sedimentation can be found and further research can be done whether the potential solutions are appropriate.