State-of-the-art ASRs show suboptimal performance for child speech. The scarcity of child speech limits the development of child speech recognition (CSR). Therefore, we studied child-to-child voice conversion (VC) from existing child speakers in the dataset and additional (new) child speakers via monolingual and cross-lingual (Dutch-to-German) VC, respectively. The results showed that cross-lingual child-to-child VC significantly improved child ASR performance. Experiments on the impact of the quantity of child-to-child cross-lingual VC-generated data on fine-tuning (FT) ASR models gave the best results with two-fold augmentation for our FT-Conformer model and FT-Whisper model which reduced WERs with ~3% absolute compared to the baseline, and with six-fold augmentation for the model trained from scratch, which improved by an absolute 3.6% WER. Moreover, using a small amount of "high-quality" VC-generated data achieved similar results to those of our best-FT models.@en

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) should serve every speaker, not only the majority “standard” speakers of a language. In order to build inclusive ASR, mitigating the bias against speaker groups who speak in a “non-standard” or “diverse” way is crucial. We aim to mitigate the bias against non-native-accented Flemish in a Flemish ASR system. Since this is a low-resource problem, we investigate the optimal type of data augmentation, i.e., speed/pitch perturbation, cross-lingual voice conversion-based methods, and SpecAugment, applied to both native Flemish and non-native-accented Flemish, for bias mitigation. The results showed that specific types of data augmentation applied to both native and non-native-accented speech improve non-native-accented ASR while applying data augmentation to the non-native-accented speech is more conducive to bias reduction. Combining both gave the largest bias reduction for human-machine interaction (HMI) as well as read-type speech.@en

In this paper, we explore the effectiveness of deploying the raw phase and magnitude spectra for dysarthric speech recognition, detection and classification. In particular, we scrutinise the usefulness of various raw phase-based representations along with their combinations with the raw magnitude spectrum and filterbank features. We employed single and multi-stream architectures consisting of a cascade of convolutional, recurrent and fully-connected layers for acoustic modelling. Furthermore, we investigate various configurations and fusion schemes as well as their training dynamics. In addition, the accuracies of the raw phase and magnitude based systems in the detection and classification tasks are studied and discussed. We report the performance on the UASpeech and TORGO dysarthric speech databases and for different severity levels. Our best system achieved WERs of 31.2% and 9.1% for dysarthric and typical speech on TORGO and 30.2% on UASpeech, respectively.

@en