In AutoML, the search space of possible pipelines is often large and multidimensional. This makes it very important to use an efficient search algorithm. We measure the effectiveness of the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm (M-H) in a pipeline synthesis framework, when the search space is described by a context-free grammar. We also compare the performance of the M-H algorithm to other search algorithms. While AutoML frameworks use many different search algorithms, and comparisons between AutoML frameworks exist, this is the first paper that compares the performance of different search algorithms in the context of pipeline synthesis under equal conditions. We found that M-H is slightly outperformed by BFS2, the simplest possible search algorithm. We conclude that the datasets we use for evaluating the algorithms are too simple to meaningfully compare the performance of different search algorithms. We also conclude that for simple datasets, simple search algorithms work best.