Spatiotemporal gait characteristics change during very slow walking, a relevant speed considering individuals with movement disorders or using assistive devices. However, we lack insights in how very slow walking affects human balance control. Therefore, we aimed to identify how healthy individuals use balance strategies while walking very slow. Ten healthy participants walked on a treadmill at an average speed of 0.43 m s⁻¹, while being perturbed at toe off right by either perturbations of the whole-body linear momentum (WBLM) or angular momentum (WBAM). WBLM perturbations were given by a perturbation on the pelvis in forward or backward direction. The WBAM was perturbed by two simultaneous perturbations in opposite directions on the pelvis and upper body. The given perturbations had magnitudes of 4, 8, 12 and 16 % of the participant's body weight, and lasted for 150 ms. After perturbations of the WBLM the centre of pressure placement was modulated using the ankle joint, while keeping the moment arm of the ground reaction force (GRF) with respect to the centre of mass (CoM) small. After the perturbations of the WBAM a quick recovery was initiated, using the hip joint and adjusting the horizontal GRF to create a moment arm with respect to the CoM. These findings suggest no fundamental differences in the use of balance strategies at very slow walking compared to normal speeds. Still as the gait phases last longer, this time was exploited to counteract perturbations in the ongoing gait phase.

@en

Humans prioritize regulation of the whole-body angular momentum (WBAM) during walking. When perturbed, modulations of the moment arm of the ground reaction force (GRF) with respect to the centre of mass (CoM) assist in recovering WBAM. For sagittal-plane perturbations of the WBAM given at toe off right (TOR), horizontal GRF modulations and not centre of pressure (COP) modulations were mainly responsible for these moment arm modulations. In this study, we aimed to find whether the instant of perturbations affects the contributions of the GRF and/or CoP modulations to the moment arm changes, in balance recovery during very slow walking. Perturbations of the WBAM were applied at three different instants of the gait cycle, namely at TOR, mid-swing (MS), and heel strike right (HSR). Forces equal to 16% of the participant's body weight were applied simultaneously to the pelvis and upper body in opposite directions for a duration of 150 ms. The results showed that the perturbation onset did not significantly affect the GRF moment arm modulation. However, the contribution of both the CoP and GRF modulation to the moment arm changes did change depending on the perturbation instant. After perturbations resulting in a forward pitch of the trunk a larger contribution was present from the CoP modulation when perturbations were given at MS or HSR, compared to perturbations at TOR. After backward pitch perturbations given at MS and HSR the CoP modulation counteracted the moment arm required for WBAM recovery. Therefore a larger contribution from the horizontal GRF was needed to direct the GRF posterior to the CoM and recover WBAM. In conclusion, the onset of WBAM perturbations does not affect the moment arm modulation needed for WBAM recovery, while it does affect the way CoP and GRF modulation contribute to that recovery.

@en

Healthy individuals highly regulate their whole body angular momentum (WBAM) during walking. Since WBAM regulation is essential in maintaining balance, a better understanding is required on how healthy individuals recover from WBAM perturbations. We therefore studied how healthy individuals recover WBAM in the sagittal plane. WBAM can be regulated by adjusting the moment arm of the ground reaction force (GRF) vector with respect to the whole-body centre of mass (CoM). In principle this can be done by centre of pressure (CoP) modulation and/or adjustments of the GRF direction. Two simultaneous perturbations of the same magnitude were applied in opposite direction to the pelvis and upper body (0.34m apart) to perturb WBAM but not the whole body linear momentum (WBLM), while participants walked on a treadmill. The perturbations were given at toe off right, had a magnitude of 4, 8, 12 and 16% of the participant's body weight, and lasted for 150ms. A recovery of the WBAM was seen directly after the perturbations, induced by adapting the moment arm of the GRF with respect to the CoM. The hip joint of the stance leg played an important role in achieving the WBAM recovery. A change in the direction of the GRF vector and not a contributing CoP modulation, caused the change in moment arm. However, the change in GRF direction came from a change in the horizontal GRF, which also affects the WBLM. This suggest that regulating WBAM may take precedence over the WBLM in early recovery.

@en

Centre of mass (CoM) motion during human balance recovery is largely influenced by the ground reaction force (GRF) and the centre of pressure (CoP). During gait, foot placement creates a region of possible CoP locations in the following double support (DS). This study aims to increase insight into how humans modulate the CoP during DS, and which CoP modulations are theoretically possible to maintain balance in the sagittal plane. Three variables sufficient to describe the shape, length and duration of the DS CoP trajectory of the total GRF, were assessed in perturbed human walking. To counteract the forward perturbations, braking was required and all CoP variables showed modulations correlated to the observed change in CoM velocity over the DS phase. These correlations were absent after backward perturbations, when only little propulsion was needed to counteract the perturbation. Using a linearized inverted pendulum model we could explore how the observed parameter modulations are effective in controlling the CoM. The distance the CoP travels forward and the instant the leading leg was loaded largely affected the CoM velocity, while the duration mainly affected the CoM position. The simulations also showed that various combinations of CoP parameters can reach a desired CoM position and velocity at the end of DS, and that even a full recovery in the sagittal plane within DS would theoretically have been possible. However, the human subjects did not exploit the therefore required CoP modulations. Overall, modulating the CoP trajectory in DS does effectively contributes to balance recovery.

@en

During walking, the vestibular influence on locomotor activity is phase-dependent and modulated in both limbs with changes in velocity. It is unclear, however, whether this bilateral modulation is due to a coordinated mechanism between both limbs or instead through limb-specific processes that remain masked by the symmetric nature of locomotion. Here, human subjects walked on a split-belt treadmill with one belt moving at 0.4 m s−1 and the other moving at 0.8 m s−1 while exposed to an electrical vestibular stimulus. Muscle activity was recorded bilaterally around the ankles of each limb and used to compare vestibulo-muscular coupling between velocity-matched and unmatched tied-belt walking. In general, response magnitudes decreased by ∼20–50% and occurred ∼13–20% earlier in the stride cycle at the higher belt velocity. This velocity-dependent modulation of vestibular-evoked muscle activity was retained during split-belt walking and was similar within each limb to velocity-matched tied-belt walking. These results demonstrate that the vestibular influence on ankle muscles during locomotion can be adapted independently to each limb. Furthermore, modulation of vestibular-evoked muscle responses occurred rapidly (∼13–34 strides) after onset of split-belt walking. This rapid adaptation contrasted the prolonged adaptation in step length symmetry (∼128 strides) as well as EMG magnitude and timing (∼40–100 and ∼20–80 strides, respectively). These results suggest that vestibular influence on ankle muscle control is adjusted rapidly in sensorimotor control loops as opposed to longer-term error correction mechanisms commonly associated split-belt adaptation. Rapid limb-specific sensorimotor feedback adaptation may be advantageous for asymmetric overground locomotion, such as navigating irregular terrain or turning.@en

In many simple walking models, foot placement dictates the center of pressure location and ground reaction force components, whereas humans can modulate these aspects after foot contact. Because of the differences, it is unclear to what extent predictions made by models are valid for human walking. Yet, both model simulations and human experimental data have previously indicated that the center of mass (COM) velocity plays an important role in regulating stable walking. Here, perturbed human walking was studied to determine the relationship of the horizontal COM velocity at heel strike and toe-off with the foot placement location relative to the COM, the forthcoming center of pressure location relative to the COM, and the ground reaction forces. Ten healthy subjects received mediolateral and anteroposterior pelvis perturbations of various magnitudes at toe-off, during 0.63 and 1.25 m s−1 treadmill walking. At heel strike after the perturbation, recovery from mediolateral perturbations involved mediolateral foot placement adjustments proportional to the mediolateral COM velocity. In contrast, for anteroposterior perturbations, no significant anteroposterior foot placement adjustment occurred at this heel strike. However, in both directions the COM velocity at heel strike related linearly to the center of pressure location at the subsequent toe-off. This relationship was affected by the walking speed and was, for the slow speed, in line with a COM velocity-based control strategy previously applied by others in a linear inverted pendulum model. Finally, changes in gait phase durations suggest that the timing of actions could play an important role during the perturbation recovery.@en