Response Amplification at Railway Transition Zones - Comparison of Soft-to-Stiff and Stiff-to-Soft Transitions

Abstract

Transition zones, characterized by significant variation in track properties (e.g., foundation stiffness) near rigid structures like bridges and tunnels, necessitate more frequent maintenance compared to standard track sections due to higher levels of differential settlements observed at transition zones. Field measurements on one-way tracks reveal asymmetric settlement patterns (i.e., different settlement in the soft-to-stiff vs stiff-to-soft transitions), yet existing literature often investigate either one or the other transition type without investigating the potential limited validity of results. This study investigates the similar aspects as well as the dissimilar ones regarding the behaviour of soft-to-stiff and stiff-to-soft transitions. Modelling results show that the behaviour of the two transition can be considerably different. These results strongly suggest that for a mitigation measure to be efficient, it may be necessary to have different designs for the two types of transition wherever possible (i.e., in one-way tracks). This study can help researchers and engineers understand the different degradation patterns obtained using more complex models or from field measurements.