Comment on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?” by Christopher Hutton et al.

Melsen, Lieke A.; Torfs, Paul J.J.F.; Uijlenhoet, R.; Teuling, A. J.

Comment on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?” by Christopher Hutton et al.

Journal article (2017)

Authors

Lieke A. Melsen Wageningen University & Research

Paul J.J.F. Torfs Wageningen University & Research

R. Uijlenhoet Wageningen University & Research

A. J. Teuling Wageningen University & Research

Affiliation

External organisation

Reproducibility Repeatability Computational hydrology

To reference this document use:

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:a1007bd9-ff83-4015-94d9-b1aaae2fec72

More Info

expand_more

Published Date

2017

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Affiliation

External organisation

Abstract

We discuss two definitions of reproducibility, and question if both definitions are required to be met in computational hydrological studies.

No files available

Metadata only record. There are no files for this journal article.