The effects of ionic strength and surface charge on O/W emulsion fouling of ceramic membranes quantified via DLVO and XDLVO models

Abstract

Large amounts of oily wastewater which included oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions, also known as produced water (PW), were produced in tandem with the enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Ultrafiltration (UF) was an effective and economic method to separate micron-sized O/W emulsions, while the membrane fouling limited its development. Understanding the fouling phenomena was essential to enhance the efficiency of membrane filtration for oil-water separation, hence this paper investigated the influence of different salinity (1 mM, 20 mM and 100 mM) and types of surfactants on the fouling of the alumina (Al2O3) membrane and the silicon carbide (SiC) deposited membrane filtrating 500 mg/L O/W emulsions with mean droplet sizes of approximately 4 ~ 7 μm, and the UF with the constant flux of 80 LMH and the crossflow velocity of 0.59 m/s was conducted. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, anionic), alkyl polyglycoside (APG, nonionic), and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB, cationic) were chosen in this study due to the frequent use in EOR, and the N-dodecyl-N,N-dimethyl-3-ammonio-1-propanesulfonate (DDAPS, zwitterionic) was selected because of its low tendency to foul at high salt concentrations.
Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) and the extended DLVO (XDLVO) models were used to quantify the membrane-oil droplet and deposited oil layer-oil droplet surface interaction. The results showed that the SiC-deposited membrane had less membrane fouling and irreversible fouling resistance compared with the Al2O3 membrane when filtrating O/W emulsions stabilized with SDS, APG or DDAPS. The DLVO model estimated emulsion fouling propensity to rise with increasing salinity when dealing with SDS, APG or DDAPS-stabilized O/W emulsions, while CTAB-stabilized emulsion fouling propensity for the SiC-deposited membrane would decrease with the higher salinity.