Josephson tunnel junction arrays and Andreev weak links

what’s the difference?

Conference paper (2023)

Authors

A.M. Bozkurt QRD/Wimmer Group - QuTech Advanced Research Centre

Valla Fatemi Cornell University College of Engineering

Research Group

QRD/Wimmer Group (QuTech Advanced Research Centre) (TU Delft)

Josephson junctions Superconductivity Mesoscopic physics Quantum information devices

To reference this document use:

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:18e148df-19ed-477c-a36e-e89352b74d31

More Info

expand_more

Published Date

2023

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

QuTech Advanced Research Centre

Department

Qubit Research Division

Research Group

QRD/Wimmer Group

Abstract

Josephson elements are cornerstones of cryogenic classical and quantum superconducting technology, owing to their nonlinearity. Two important types of Josephson elements are often considered distinct: the tunnel junction (superconductor-insulator-superconductor, SIS) and the normal weak link (superconductor-normal-superconductor, SNS) referring to any non-superconducting and non-insulating central region. SNS junctions and SIS junctions have appeared in related technological and basic science contexts over the last decade. In this perspective article, we review correspondences between SISIS junctions and SNS junctions in limiting regimes, in which a single, general energy-phase relationship describes the systems. We show how this insight helped to connect recent bodies of theoretical and experimental work in both systems. We conclude by describing a few important differences that also impact their use in applied contexts.