The 2013 reorganisation of the Dutch Police into a single organisation with ten regional units
significantly reshaped their real estate needs, prompting plans to reduce 700.000 m² of real estate, add 200.000 m² of new construction, and renovate assets to align with the organisational changes. Since 2017, the Police have adopted a housing policy containing standardisation to tackle their real estate needs, including streamline processes, reduce costs, and create uniformity in new team bureaus. But balancing standardisation with diverse end user needs remains a key challenge, since it’s hard to make changes to the standards in place. The resulting tension between standardisation and diverse user needs raises critical questions about its impact on satisfaction in new team bureaus. Since 2021, new Police team bureaus with standard aspects and standard processes have been developed under this housing policy, but no research has yet explored the impact of standardisation on user satisfaction. This research sought to fill that gap by investigating how the Police's standardisation approach influences end user satisfaction in the new team
bureaus by answering the following research question: “How does the standardisation aspect of the housing policy affect end user satisfaction in the new Police team bureaus?”. To answer this research question, qualitative data collection methods were used. The methods involved a literature review, a case study analysis and in-depth interviews. For the case study, four team bureaus were selected. In-depth interviews were conducted with Police housing staff, end users of team bureaus and architects to gather insights into standardisation and the satisfaction of end users.
Standardisation within the housing policy occurs within standard products and standard processes.
Findings indicate that user involvement and clear, transparent communication in standardised processes, such as the design phase, positively influence satisfaction, while the requirements phase, perceived as overly theoretical, reduces it. Standardised products like building blocks and lay-outs are functional but sometimes struggle to meet specific needs such as noise control and spaces for focused work. Satisfaction hinges on the quality of the standard and its ability to balance uniformity with flexibility. Based on this results, recommendations have been formulated. They pertain to standardising processes, communication, incorporating Post-Occupancy Evaluations, monitoring policy documents, creating
involvement and other important aspects of standard products and processes.

The Netherlands is dealing with a severe housing crisis due to factors like population growth and a shortage of affordable homes. This has led to soaring housing prices impacting all citizens. Particularly impacted by the consequences of ineffective policies for housing provision are status holders. Due to lack of homes made available for this target group the throughput of refugees with a temporary residency permit out of reception centres stagnates, increasing the pressure on these already overcrowded settlements.
Urgent action is needed, including comprehensive housing policies and increased investment in affordable housing. Therefore the government has introduced flexible housing as a promising solution. These are modular houses placed on temporary plots otherwise unsuitable for permanent housing.
However, studies show that in order to integrate into society, factors such as housing stability, access to social network and future perspective play an important role. This is seemingly difficult to reconcile with the temporary character of flex homes.
This study examines strategies for stakeholders to develop flex homes in a manner that enhances the capabilities of status holders to integrate. By identifying approaches and practices that can optimize partnerships between key stakeholders from both the social and spatial realm and ways to encourage these partnerships. This can be done with financial arrangements such as subsidies. Through a comprehensive literature review, interviews with experts and a case study of three flex housing projects, the partnerships, financial arrangements and capabilities for integration are investigated.
Findings show that early engagement of key stakeholders, interdisciplinary partnerships and financial arrangements that hold these interdisciplinary collaborations as a condition can have a positive impact on the contributing factors of integration for status holders. Primarily because this allows the social partners to exchange their knowledge on social integration at an early stage in the development process, influencing both the design as the long term social management approaches.
This study suggests that the integration capabilities of status holders should be considered at an early stage in the development process. Requiring a contribution from key stakeholders from both the social domain, as the spatial domain, and stimulating mechanisms from the government.

Keywords:
flex housing, integration, status holders, partnership models, financial arrangements