This study explores the ethical complexities of using introspective methods, particularly autoethnography, in design research. Drawing from relevant literature, we identify six significant ethical risks – psychological or emotional, physical, privacy, social, career and economic, and integrity risks – that may be experienced by the researcher, individuals represented in autoethnographic accounts, and the readership at different phases of autoethnographic research. These unique risks stem from the dual role of ‘researcher as subject’ and highlight the inadequacy of conventional ethical frameworks in addressing them. In response, we developed the Introspector’s Toolkit for Responsible Practice, a practical resource designed to guide researchers through a pre-study self-consent ritual and support continuous ethical reflection throughout their research. The toolkit integrates multidimensional ethics, meta-autoethnographies, and critical reflective practices to provide a theoretically sound yet practical, structured yet dynamic approach to managing the ethical complexities of autoethnography. While this toolkit represents a promising step towards more ethically responsible and reflective use of autoethnography in design research, it is intended as a foundational resource, open to iterative refinement based on researcher feedback and evolving ethical challenges.@en

Introspective (or first-person) methods are carving out their niche in experience design research. Relevant epistemological conversations in recent years have led experience design researchers to appreciate the value of “researcher as subject” in understanding nuanced, rich, felt human experiences mediated by designs. However, there is still a clear need for more detailed guidance on how to employ introspective methods for experience design research. This existing gap in practical application often leads to inconsistent or inconsiderate use, especially among design researchers new to these methods. To address this, this paper explores various ways design researchers can collect introspective data. We conducted a systematic review of 118 articles, each employing or developing introspective methods in some form, published by reputable design research venues from 2012 to 2022. Our analysis offers a comprehensive and organized overview of six categories of introspective data collection techniques and the supportive tools for each. Additionally, we reflect on the current use of introspective methods in experience design research and propose five recommendations for future methodological development. We aspire for this paper to serve as a timely, go-to guide for introspective design researchers, and to promote a more refined and thoughtful application of introspective methods in our field.@en