Motivation In biology, we are often faced with multiple datasets recorded on the same set of objects, such as multi-omics and phenotypic data of the same tumors. These datasets are typically not independent from each other. For example, methylation may influence gene expression, which may, in turn, influence drug response. Such relationships can strongly affect analyses performed on the data, as we have previously shown for the identification of biomarkers of drug response. Therefore, it is important to be able to chart the relationships between datasets. Results We present iTOP, a methodology to infer a topology of relationships between datasets. We base this methodology on the RV coefficient, a measure of matrix correlation, which can be used to determine how much information is shared between two datasets. We extended the RV coefficient for partial matrix correlations, which allows the use of graph reconstruction algorithms, such as the PC algorithm, to infer the topologies. In addition, since multi-omics data often contain binary data (e.g. mutations), we also extended the RV coefficient for binary data. Applying iTOP to pharmacogenomics data, we found that gene expression acts as a mediator between most other datasets and drug response: only proteomics clearly shares information with drug response that is not present in gene expression. Based on this result, we used TANDEM, a method for drug response prediction, to identify which variables predictive of drug response were distinct to either gene expression or proteomics. Availability and implementation An implementation of our methodology is available in the R package iTOP on CRAN. Additionally, an R Markdown document with code to reproduce all figures is provided as Supplementary Material. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

@en

Motivation
Genome-wide measurements of genetic and epigenetic alterations are generating more and more high-dimensional binary data. The special mathematical characteristics of binary data make the direct use of the classical principal component analysis (PCA) model to explore low-dimensional structures less obvious. Although there are several PCA alternatives for binary data in the psychometric, data analysis and machine learning literature, they are not well known to the bioinformatics community. Results: In this article, we introduce the motivation and rationale of some parametric and nonparametric versions of PCA specifically geared for binary data. Using both realistic simulations of binary data as well as mutation, CNA and methylation data of the Genomic Determinants of Sensitivity in Cancer 1000 (GDSC1000), the methods were explored for their performance with respect to finding the correct number of components, overfit, finding back the correct low-dimensional structure, variable importance, etc. The results show that if a low-dimensional structure exists in the data, that most of the methods can find it. When assuming a probabilistic generating process is underlying the data, we recommend to use the parametric logistic PCA model, while when such an assumption is not valid and the data are considered as given, the nonparametric Gifi model is recommended.
@en