It is demonstrated that in the (near) zero-gravity experiments conducted by Tang et al. (Combust. Flame; 2009, 2011) iron powder aerosols created using the finest powders are optically thick, implying that radiative heat transfer between particles should not be neglected. To test this concept, an iron particle oxidation model has been implemented in OpenFOAM, including a coupling with the P1-model for radiative heat transfer. For flame simulations in which radiation is not included, obtained flame propagation velocities deviate less than 8% with results obtained using Chem1D-Fe and also show a good correspondance with algebraic models for optically thin aerosols. No significant difference in predicted flame propagation velocity is observed between 1D and 3D simulations: contrary to what is seen in gaseous flames, including the curvature of the flame does not increase predicted flame speeds substantially. However, measured flame propagation velocity values exceed numerically obtained predictions excluding thermal radiation by a factor of three to four. To the authors’ knowledge, this discrepancy is exemplary for the difference between experimentally obtained values for flame propagation velocities, and predictions made using numerical simulation tools neglecting radiative heat transfer. Accounting for radiation increases predicted flame propagation velocities, in the absence of confining boundaries, by approximately a factor of 10 which is in line with algebraic models for optically thick aerosols. In 3D simulations for the two finest iron powders in the experiments, including radiation and accounting for the presence of the confining tube wall results in an error of 11% and 35% with respect to measured flame propagation velocities, significantly smaller than predictions obtained excluding thermal radiation. Although these flames are not purely radiation-driven, inclusion of particle-to-particle radiative heat transfer enhances flame propagation velocities in simulations to values that correspond much better with experimental values than if radiation would not be taken into account.@en