Decreasing the preheating temperature is an effective step to control the energy consumption in the hot rolling process. In order to obtain the lowest preheating temperature to prepare enough thickness of oxide scale in the hot rolling process, the oxidation resistance of commercial steel samples with different Al and Si contents were investigated in this paper. The results indicate that both Al and Si based oxides form at the steel-oxides interface as diffusion barrier but Al provide stronger diffusion resistance than Si in the diffusion-controlling oxidation region. Meanwhile, a three-dimensional oxidation kinetic model has been adopted to depict the oxidation behavior of four types of commercial steel. The oxidation process of automotive steel sample containing with low alloy elements is kinetically determined by interface chemical reaction. Its activation energy is 55.2 ± 6.9 kJ/mol. As for silicon steel containing with relative high alloy elements, its controlling process is determined by diffusion step at low temperature and controlled by chemical reaction rate at high temperature. In order to obtain enough thickness of oxide scale, the lowest preheating temperature of different types steel range from high to low should be the steel with high content of Al (1180 °C), the steel with high content of Si and low content of Al (1130 °C) and the steel with high contents of Si and Al (1030 °C).

Over the last few decades, China has seen a steep rise in diverse eco city and low carbon city policies. Recently, attention has begun to focus on the perceived shortcomings in the practical delivery of related initiatives, with several publications suggesting a gap between ambitious policy goals and the emerging realities of the newly built environment. To probe this further, in this article we examine – based on the policy network approach – how the gap between high-level national policies and local practice implementation can be explained in the current Chinese context. We develop a four-pronged typology of eco city projects based on differential involvement of key (policy) actor groups, followed by a mapping of what are salient policy network relations among these actors in each type. Our analysis suggests that, within the overall framework of national policy, a core axis in the network relations is that between local government and land developers. In some cases, central government agencies – often with buy-in from international architecture, engineering and consulting firms – seek to influence local government planning through various incentives aimed at rendering sustainability a serious consideration. However, this is mostly done in a top-down manner, which overemphasizes a rational, technocratic planning mode while underemphasizing interrelationships among actors. This makes the emergence of a substantial implementation gap in eco city practice an almost predictable outcome. Consequently, we argue that special attention be paid in particular to the close interdependency between the interests of local government actors and those of land and real estate developers. Factoring in this aspect of the policy network is essential if eco city implementation is to gain proper traction on the ground.