Personalized treatment informed by computational models has the potential to markedly improve the outcome for patients with a type B aortic dissection. However, existing computational models of dissected walls significantly simplify the characteristic false lumen, tears and/or material behavior. Moreover, the patient-specific wall thickness and stiffness cannot be accurately captured non-invasively in clinical practice, which inevitably leads to assumptions in these wall models. It is important to evaluate the impact of the corresponding uncertainty on the predicted wall deformations and stress, which are both key outcome indicators for treatment optimization. Therefore, a physiology-inspired finite element framework was proposed to model the wall deformation and stress of a type B aortic dissection at diastolic and systolic pressure. Based on this framework, 300 finite element analyses, sampled with a Latin hypercube, were performed to assess the global uncertainty, introduced by 4 uncertain wall thickness and stiffness input parameters, on 4 displacement and stress output parameters. The specific impact of each input parameter was estimated using Gaussian process regression, as surrogate model of the finite element framework, and a δ moment-independent analysis. The global uncertainty analysis indicated minor differences between the uncertainty at diastolic and systolic pressure. For all output parameters, the 4^th quartile contained the major fraction of the uncertainty. The parameter-specific uncertainty analysis elucidated that the material stiffness and relative thickness of the dissected membrane were the respective main determinants of the wall deformation and stress. The uncertainty analysis provides insight into the effect of uncertain wall thickness and stiffness parameters on the predicted deformation and stress. Moreover, it emphasizes the need for probabilistic rather than deterministic predictions for clinical decision making in aortic dissections.

@en

Computational investigations of how soft tissues grow and remodel are gaining more and more interest and several growth and remodeling theories have been developed. Roughly, two main groups of theories for soft tissues can be distinguished: kinematic-based growth theory and theories based on constrained mixture theory. Our goal was to apply these two theories on the same experimental data. Within the experiment, a pulmonary artery was exposed to systemic conditions. The change in diameter was followed-up over time. A mechanical and microstructural analysis of native pulmonary artery and pulmonary autograft was conducted. Whereas the kinematic-based growth theory is able to accurately capture the growth of the tissue, it does not account for the mechanobiological processes causing this growth. The constrained mixture theory takes into account the mechanobiological processes including removal, deposition and adaptation of all structural constituents, allowing us to simulate a changing microstructure and mechanical behavior.@en