Tropical rainforests rely on their root systems to access moisture stored in soil during wet periods for use during dry periods. When this root zone soil moisture is inadequate to sustain a forest ecosystem, they transition to a savanna-like state, losing their native structure and functions. Yet the influence of climate change on ecosystem's root zone soil moisture storage and the impact on rainforest ecosystems remain uncertain. This study assesses the future state of rainforests and the risk of forest-to-savanna transitions in South America and Africa under four Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5). Using a mass-balance-based empirical understanding of root zone storage capacity (Sr), defined as the maximum volume of root zone soil moisture per unit area accessible to vegetation's roots for transpiration, we project how rainforest ecosystems will respond to future climate changes. We find that under the end-of-the-21st-century climate, nearly one-third of the total forest area will be influenced by climate change. As the climate warms, forests will require a larger Sr than they do under the current climate to sustain their ecosystem structure and functions, making them more susceptible to water limitations. Furthermore, warming beyond 1.5–2 °C will significantly elevate the risk of a forest–savanna transition. In the Amazon, the forest area at risk of such a transition grows by about 1.7–5.8 times in size compared to the immediate lower-warming scenario (e.g. SSP2-4.5 compared to SSP1-2.6). In contrast, the risk growth in the Congo is less substantial, ranging from 0.7–1.7 times. These insights underscore the urgent need to limit the rise in global surface temperature below the Paris Agreement to conserve rainforest ecosystems and associated ecosystem services.@en

Forest and savanna ecosystems naturally exist as alternative stable states. The maximum capacity of these ecosystems to absorb perturbations without transitioning to the other alternative stable state is referred to as ‘resilience’. Previous studies have determined the resilience of terrestrial ecosystems to hydroclimatic changes predominantly based on space-for-time substitution. This substitution assumes that the contemporary spatial frequency distribution of ecosystems’ tree cover structure holds across time. However, this assumption is problematic since ecosystem adaptation over time is ignored. Here we empirically study tropical forests’ stability and hydroclimatic adaptation dynamics by examining remotely sensed tree cover change (ΔTC; aboveground ecosystem structural change) and root zone storage capacity (S_r; buffer capacity towards water-stress) over the last two decades. We find that ecosystems at high (>75%) and low (<10%) tree cover adapt by instigating considerable subsoil investment, and therefore experience limited ΔTC—signifying stability. In contrast, unstable ecosystems at intermediate (30%–60%) tree cover are unable to exploit the same level of adaptation as stable ecosystems, thus showing considerable ΔTC. Ignoring this adaptive mechanism can underestimate the resilience of the forest ecosystems, which we find is largely underestimated in the case of the Congo rainforests. The results from this study emphasise the importance of the ecosystem's temporal dynamics and adaptation in inferring and assessing the risk of forest-savannah transitions under rapid hydroclimatic change.

@en