This thesis explores the feasibility of using a helical pile foundation with a tension leg mooring system to support a 15MW floating offshore wind turbine and assesses its financial viability compared to alternative anchor concepts.

The study commenced with an extensive literature review, drawing from a diverse range of sources, including reviews, offshore guidelines, research papers, and expert interviews. The literature review was conducted to enhance the understanding of the use of helical piles in the offshore industry, encompassing their fundamental characteristics, current applications, and potential contributions. For this investigation, a Tension Leg Platform (TLP) featuring a 15 MW wind turbine, engineered by Heerema Engineering Solutions (HES), was employed. Time-domain simulations, accounting for environmental conditions, were carried out using the OrcaFlex software. These simulations led to the determination of the mooring line tensions, with the maximum value identified as the design load case. During the helical pile geometry optimization process, which focused on maximizing uplift capacity, it was established that a single helical pile in dense sand can achieve a maximum uplift capacity of 7.91 MN, while taking into account geotechnical, structural, and installation constraints. As a result, considering the significant uplift capacity demands of TLPs, it is essential to employ helical pile grouping, necessitating a minimum of four helical piles. Consequently, the design of the helical pile group anchors confirms their ability to meet the uplift and lateral capacity requirements of TLPs. Furthermore, the exploration of variations in equipment, steel strength, helical pile geometry, and soil conditions has yielded promising results. It is important to note that achieving the required installation depth for these group anchors involves a significant force and torque during the installation process, presenting potential challenges. Consequently, the development of equipment capable of meeting these installation requirements is vital for ensuring the feasibility of these helical pile group anchors.

The performance of helical pile group anchors was analysed from economic, technical, and environmental perspectives, with a comparison to suction and driven pile anchor concepts. The economic evaluation showed that the estimated total costs for the 4-pile helical group anchor, utilizing a singlepile installation method, are notably higher when factoring in the costs related to developing helical pile equipment, making it less financially attractive compared to the developed suction and driven pile anchor concepts. However, when excluding these equipment costs, the 4-pile helical group anchor ranked as the second-most financially attractive option, regardless of the installation technique, with only the single driven pile anchor being less expensive. Notably, it was discovered that, in a scenario where structural, geotechnical, and installation constraints are disregarded, the single pile helical anchor emerges as the most financially attractive among all anchor types, even surpassing the single pile driven anchor. This suggests that overcoming challenges related to scaling up helical pile dimensions, like enhancing their structural integrity, and reducing installation requirements through innovative designs, could make the use of fewer piles in a helical pile group anchor a feasible choice. In addition to these quantifiable factors, helical piles offer the advantage of a low-noise installation method, which becomes increasingly important due to the growing noise disturbance legislation in certain regions. Furthermore, their adaptability to various ground conditions through flexible installation techniques makes them a convenient choice for sites with limited access or specific inclination requirements...