Interpreted applications are often vulnerable to remote code execution attacks. To protect interpreted applications, we should reduce the tools available to the attackers. In this thesis, we investigate the possibilities for the automation of policy generation for interpreted applications in terms of system call arguments. These policies are used for system call argument interposition. We compare two approaches working on the interpreter to find if any of these two can provide meaningful policies. The first is dynamic analysis, and the second is static analysis, which uses symbolic execution.

The symbolic execution was least effective as it provides policies only for a small portion of the system call arguments, less than ten per cent, and hinders normal execution of applications with these policies. The dynamic analysis solution fares better, providing a restriction for about forty per cent of the system call arguments. We conclude that automatic policy generation of system call arguments for interpreted applications is a meaningful endeavour.