Introduction: This study focuses on the quantification of and current guidelines on the hazards related to needle positioning in prostate cancer treatment: (1) access restrictions to the prostate gland by the pubic arch, so-called Pubic Arch Interference (PAI) and (2) needle positioning errors. Next, we propose solution strategies to mitigate these hazards. Methods: The literature search was executed in the Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core Collection*, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Results: The literature search resulted in 50 included articles. PAI was reported in patients with various prostate volumes. The level of reported PAI varied between 0 and 22.3 mm, depending on the patient’s position and the measuring method. Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy induced the largest reported misplacement errors, especially in the cranio-caudal direction (up to 10 mm) and the largest displacement errors were reported for High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in the cranio-caudal direction (up to 47 mm), generally increasing over time. Conclusions: Current clinical guidelines related to prostate volume, needle positioning accuracy, and maximum allowable PAI are ambiguous, and compliance in the clinical setting differs between institutions. Solutions, such as steerable needles, assist in mitigating the hazards and potentially allow the physician to proceed with the procedure. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered at Protocols.io (DOI: dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.6qpvr89eplmk/v1).

Introduction: Conventional cancer treatments such as radical surgery and systemic therapy targeting the organ or organ system might have side effects because of damage to the surrounding tissue. For this reason, there is a need for new instruments that focally treat cancer. Areas covered: This review provides a comprehensive overview of the patent literature on minimally and noninvasive focal therapy instruments to treat localized cancer. The medical section of the Google Patents database was scanned, and 128 patents on focal therapy instruments published in the last two decades (2000–2021) were retrieved and classified. The classification is based on the treatment target (cancer cell or network of cancer cells), treatment purpose (destroy the cancerous structure or disable its function), and treatment means (energy, matter, or a combination of both). Expert opinion: We found patents describing instruments for all groups, except for the instruments that destroy a cancer cell network structure by applying matter (e.g. particles) to the network. The description of the different treatment types may serve as a source of inspiration for new focal therapy instruments to treat localized cancer.