It is a conjecture that the ε subunit regulates ATP hydrolytic function of the F1Fo ATP synthase in bacteria. This has been proposed by the ε subunit taking an extended conformation, with a terminal helix probing into the central architecture of the hexameric catalytic domain, preventing ATP hydrolysis. The ε subunit takes a contracted conformation when bound to ATP, thus would not interfere with catalysis. A recent crystallographic study has disputed this; the Caldalkalibacillus thermarum TA2.A1 F1Fo ATP synthase cannot natively hydrolyse ATP, yet studies have demonstrated that the loss of the ε subunit terminal helix results in an ATP synthase capable of ATP hydrolysis, supporting ε subunit function. Analysis of sequence and crystallographic data of the C. thermarum F1Fo ATP synthase revealed two unique histidine residues. Molecular dynamics simulations suggested that the protonation state of these residues may influence ATP binding site stability. Yet these residues lie outside
the ATP/Mg2+ binding site of the ε subunit. We then probed the effect of pH on the ATP binding affinity of the ε subunit from the C. thermarum F1Fo ATP synthase at various physiologically relevant pH values. We show that binding affinity changes 5.9 fold between pH 7.0, where binding is weakest, to pH 8.5 where it is strongest. Since the C. thermarum cytoplasm is pH 8.0 when it grows optimally, this correlates to the ε subunit being down due to ATP/Mg2+ affinity, and not being involved in blocking ATP hydrolysis. Here, we have experimentally correlated that the pH of the bacterial cytoplasm is of critical importance for ε subunit ATP affinity regulated by second shell residues thus the function of the ε subunit changes with growth conditions.@en

Background: Prediction of ligand binding and design of new function in enzymes is a time-consuming and expensive process. Crystallography gives the impression that proteins adopt a fixed shape, yet enzymes are functionally dynamic. Molecular dynamics offers the possibility of probing protein movement while predicting ligand binding. Accordingly, we choose the bacterial F₁F_o ATP synthase ε subunit to unravel why ATP affinity by ε subunits from Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus PS3 differs ~500-fold, despite sharing identical sequences at the ATP-binding site. Methods: We first used the Bacillus PS3 ε subunit structure to model the B. subtilis ε subunit structure and used this to explore the utility of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to predict the influence of residues outside the ATP binding site. To verify the MD predictions, point mutants were made and ATP binding studies were employed. Results: MD simulations predicted that E102 in the B. subtilis ε subunit, outside of the ATP binding site, influences ATP binding affinity. Engineering E102 to alanine or arginine revealed a ~10 or ~54 fold increase in ATP binding, respectively, confirming the MD prediction that E102 drastically influences ATP binding affinity. Conclusions: These findings reveal how MD can predict how changes in the “second shell” residues around substrate binding sites influence affinity in simple protein structures. Our results reveal why seemingly identical ε subunits in different ATP synthases have radically different ATP binding affinities. General significance: This study may lead to greater utility of molecular dynamics as a tool for protein design and exploration of protein design and function.

@en

The ϵ subunit of ATP synthases has been proposed to regulate ATP hydrolysis in bacteria. Prevailing evidence supports the notion that when the ATP concentration falls below a certain threshold, the ϵ subunit changes its conformation from a non-inhibitory down-state to an extended up-state that then inhibits enzymatic ATP hydrolysis by binding to the catalytic domain. It has been demonstrated that the ϵ subunit from Bacillus PS3 is selective for ATP over other nucleotides, including GTP. In this study, the purine triphosphate selectivity is rationalized by using results from MD simulations and free energy calculations for the R103A/R115A mutant of the ϵ subunit from Bacillus PS3, which binds ATP more strongly than the wild-type protein. Our results are in good agreement with experimental data, and the elucidated molecular basis for selectivity could help to guide the design of novel GTP sensors.

@en

ATP synthases catalyse the formation of ATP, the most common chemical energy storage unit found in living cells. These enzymes are driven by an electrochemical ion gradient, which allows the catalytic evolution of ATP by a binding change mechanism. Most ATP synthases are capable of catalysing ATP hydrolysis to varying degrees, and to prevent wasteful ATP hydrolysis, bacteria and mitochondria have regulatory mechanisms such as ADP inhibition. Additionally, 1 subunit inhibition has also been described in three bacterial systems, Escherichia coli, Bacillus PS3 and Caldalkalibacillus thermarum TA2.A1. Previous studies suggest that the 1 subunit is capable of undergoing an ATP-dependent conformational change from the ATP hydrolytic inhibitory ‘extended’ conformation to the ATP-induced non-inhibitory ‘hairpin’ conformation. A recently published crystal structure of the F₁ domain of the C. thermarum TA2.A1 F₁F_o ATP synthase revealed a mutant 1 subunit lacking the ability to bind ATP in a hairpin conformation. This is a surprising observation considering it is an organism that performs no ATP hydrolysis in vivo, and appears to challenge the current dogma on the regulatory role of the 1 subunit. This has prompted a re-examination of present knowledge of the 1 subunits role in different organisms. Here, we compare published biochemical, biophysical and structural data involving 1 subunit-mediated ATP hydrolysis regulation in a variety of organisms, concluding that the 1 subunit from the bacterial F-type ATP synthases is indeed capable of regulating ATP hydrolysis activity in a wide variety of bacteria, making it a potentially valuable drug target, but its exact role is still under debate.

@en