The Airborne ROmanian Measurements of Aerosols and Trace gases (AROMAT) campaigns took place in Romania in September 2014 and August 2015. They focused on two sites: the Bucharest urban area and large power plants in the Jiu Valley. The main objectives of the campaigns were to test recently developed airborne observation systems dedicated to air quality studies and to verify their applicability for the validation of space-borne atmospheric missions such as the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI)/Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5P). We present the AROMAT campaigns from the perspective of findings related to the validation of tropospheric NO2, SO2, and H2CO. We also quantify the emissions of NOx and SO2 at both measurement sites. We show that tropospheric NO2 vertical column density (VCD) measurements using airborne mapping instruments are well suited for satellite validation in principle. The signalto- noise ratio of the airborne NO2 measurements is an order of magnitude higher than its space-borne counterpart when the airborne measurements are averaged at the TROPOMI pixel scale. However, we show that the temporal variation of the NO2 VCDs during a flight might be a significant source of comparison error. Considering the random error of the TROPOMI tropospheric NO2 VCD, the dynamic range of the NO2 VCDs field extends from detection limit up to 37 (2:61016 molec. cm-2) and 29 (21016 molec. cm-2) for Bucharest and the Jiu Valley, respectively. For both areas, we simulate validation exercises applied to the TROPOMI tropospheric NO2 product. These simulations indicate that a comparison error budget closely matching the TROPOMI optimal target accuracy of 25% can be obtained by adding NO2 and aerosol profile information to the airborne mapping observations, which constrains the investigated accuracy to within 28 %. In addition to NO2, our study also addresses the measurements of SO2 emissions from power plants in the Jiu Valley and an urban hotspot of H2CO in the centre of Bucharest. For these two species, we conclude that the best validation strategy would consist of deploying ground-based measurement systems at well-identified locations.

@en

A Sentinel-5p/TROPOMI validation campaign was held in the Netherlands based at the Cabauw Experimental Site for Atmospheric Research during September 2019. The TROpomi vaLIdation eXperiment (TROLIX) consisted of active and passive remote sensing platforms in conjunction with several balloon-borne, airborne and surface chemical measurements. The goal of this geophysical validation campaign was to make intensive observations to establish the quality of TROPOMI L2 main data products (UVAI, Aerosol Layer Height, NO2, O3, HCHO, Clouds) under realistic non-idealized conditions with varying cloud cover and a wide range of atmospheric conditions. Since TROPOMI is a hyperspectral imager with a very high spatial resolution of 3.5x7 km2, understanding local effects such as inhomogeneous sources of pollution, sub-pixel clouds and variations in ground albedo is important to interpret TROPOMI results. Therefore, the campaign included sub-pixel resolution local networks of sensors, involving Pandora and MAXDOAS instruments, around Cabauw (51.97° N, 4.93° E) and within the city of Rotterdam. Cabauw is considered rural while Rotterdam is densely populated and industrialized. These focal areas were connected through airborne as well as ground based mobile observations. Cabauw, using its comprehensive in-situ and remote sensing observation program in and around the 213 m meteorological tower, was the main site of the campaign with focus on vertical profiling using lidar instruments for aerosols, clouds, water vapor, tropospheric and stratospheric ozone, as well as balloon-borne sensors for NO2 and ozone. The data set collected can be directly compared to the TROPOMI L2 data products, while measurements of parameters related to a-priori data and auxiliary parameters that influence the quality of the L2 products such as aerosol and cloud profiles and in-situ aerosol and atmospheric chemistry were also collected. This paper gives an overview of the campaign, and an overview of the participating main and ancillary instrumentation. Furthermore, an overview of the meteorological and atmospheric conditions observed during the campaign is given from the respective perspectives of the participating instruments, including satellite observations and the support by atmospheric modeling (CAMS). @en