We present an iterative nonlinear inverse scattering algorithm for high-resolution acoustic imaging of density and velocity variations. To solve the multi-parameter nonlinear direct scattering problem, the acoustic wave equation for inhomogeneous media in the frequency domain is transformed into a vectorial integral equation of the Lippmann-Schwinger type for the combined pressure and pressure-gradient field. To solve the multi-parameter nonlinear inverse scattering problem, we use the Newton-Kantorovich method in conjunction with matrix-free representations of the Fréchet derivative operators and their adjoints. The approximate Hessian information that is accounted for in our iterative solution of the (nonlinear) multi-parameter inverse scattering problem is essential for the mitigation of multi-parameter cross talk effects. Numerical examples related to seismic and medical ultrasound breast imaging illustrate the performance of the new algorithm for multi-parameter acoustic imaging.

Transcranial ultrasound has been used to image the brain since 1942. Currently, it is regaining interest and full-waveform inversion (FWI) methods are now employed to reconstruct speed-of-sound profiles of the brain. Many of these methods require a good starting model. Here, we test the applicability of contrast source inversion (CSI) as a FWI method to reconstruct two-dimensional speed-of-sound profiles of the soft brain tissue enclosed by the skull. The advantage of CSI is that it can handle large acoustic contrasts without the need for a good starting model. To test the performance of CSI, we first compute synthetic data. The resulting pressure field clearly shows a significant amount of multiple scattering caused by the skull that acts as a hard acoustic contrast. Next we invert the resulting synthetic data within the Born approximation as well as by applying CSI as a FWI method. The results clearly show that Born inversion can only image the soft brain tissue in the absence of the skull whereas it generates erroneous results when the skull is present. On the other hand, with CSI it is feasible to reconstruct both the skull and the soft brain tissue accurately. Importantly, as compared to other methods CSI does not require any a priori information about the contrast, a mask or a heterogeneous starting model to reconstruct the soft tissue enclosed by the skull.