We demonstrate SPATIAL, a proof-of-concept system that augments modern applications with capabilities to analyze trustworthy properties of AI models. The practical analysis of trustworthy properties is key to guaranteeing the safety of users and overall society when interacting with AI -driven applications. SPATIAL implements AI dashboards to introduce human-in-the-loop capabilities for the construction of AI models. SPATIAL allows different stakeholders to obtain quantifiable insights that characterize the decision making process of AI. This information can then be used by the stakeholders to comprehend possible issues that influence the performance of AI models, such that the issues can be resolved by human operators. Through rigorous benchmarks and experiments in a real-world industrial application, we demonstrate that SPATIAL can easily augment modern applications with metrics to gauge and monitor trustworthiness. However, this, in turn, increases the complexity of developing and maintaining the systems implementing AI. Our work paves the way towards augmenting modern applications with trustworthy AI mechanisms and human oversight approaches.@en

Despite its enormous economical and societal impact, lack of human-perceived control and safety is re-defining the design and development of emerging AI-based technologies. New regulatory requirements mandate increased human control and oversight of AI, transforming the development practices and responsibilities of individuals interacting with AI. In this paper, we present the SPATIAL architecture, a system that augments modern applications with capabilities to gauge and monitor trustworthy properties of AI inference capabilities. To design SPATIAL, we first explore the evolution of modern system architectures and how AI components and pipelines are integrated. With this information, we then develop a proof-of- concept architecture that analyzes AI models in a human-in-the- loop manner. SPATIAL provides an AI dashboard for allowing individuals interacting with applications to obtain quantifiable insights about the AI decision process. This information is then used by human operators to comprehend possible issues that influence the performance of AI models and adjust or counter them. Through rigorous benchmarks and experiments in real- world industrial applications, we demonstrate that SPATIAL can easily augment modern applications with metrics to gauge and monitor trustworthiness, however, this in turn increases the complexity of developing and maintaining systems implementing AI. Our work highlights lessons learned and experiences from augmenting modern applications with mechanisms that support regulatory compliance of AI. In addition, we also present a road map of on-going challenges that require attention to achieve robust trustworthy analysis of AI and greater engagement of human oversight.@en