This article tackles the Distribution Network Expansion Planning (DNEP) problem that has to be solved by distribution network operators to decide which, where, and/or when enhancements to electricity networks should be introduced to satisfy the future power demands. Because of many real-world details involved, the structure of the problem is not exploited easily using mathematical programming techniques, for which reason we consider solving this problem with evolutionary algorithms (EAs). We compare three types of EAs for optimizing expansion plans: the classic genetic algorithm (GA), the estimation-of-distribution algorithm (EDA), and the Gene-pool Optimal Mixing Evolutionary Algorithm (GOMEA). Not fully knowing the structure of the problem, we study the effect of linkage learning through the use of three linkage models: univariate, marginal product, and linkage tree. We furthermore experiment with the impact of incorporating different levels of problem-specific knowledge in the variation operators. Experiments show that the use of problem-specific variation operators is far more important for the classic GA to find high-quality solutions. In all EAs, the marginal product model and its linkage learning procedure have difficulty in capturing and exploiting the DNEP problem structure. GOMEA, especially when combined with the linkage tree structure, is found to have the most robust performance by far, even when an out-of-the-box variant is used that does not exploit problem-specific knowledge. Based on experiments, we suggest that when selecting optimization algorithms for power system expansion planning problems, EAs that have the ability to effectively model and efficiently exploit problem structures, such as GOMEA, should be given priority, especially in the case of black-box or grey-box optimization.@en

The recently introduced Multi-Objective Gene-pool Optimal Mixing Evolutionary Algorithm (MO-GOMEA) exhibits excellent scalability in solving a wide range of challenging discrete multi-objective optimization problems. In this paper, we address scalability issues in solving multi-objective optimization problems with continuous variables by introducing the Multi-Objective Real-Valued GOMEA (MO-RV-GOMEA), which combines MO-GOMEA with aspects of the multi-objective estimation-of-distribution algorithm known as MAMaLGaM. MO-RV-GOMEA exploits linkage structure in optimization problems by performing distribution estimation, adaptation, and sampling as well as solution mixing based on an explicitly-defined linkage model. Such a linkage model can be defined a priori when some problem-specific knowledge is available, or it can be learned from the population. The scalability of MO-RV-GOMEA using different linkage models is compared to the state-of-the-art multi-objective evolutionary algorithms NSGA-II and MAMaLGaM on a wide range of benchmark problems. MO-RV-GOMEA is found to retain the excellent scalability of MO-GOMEA through the successful exploitation of linkage structure, scaling substantially better than NSGA-II and MAMaLGaM. This scalability is even further improved when partial evaluations are possible, achieving strongly sub-linear scalability in terms of the number of evaluations.@en

We address the problemof high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning for prostate cancer. The problem involves determining a treatment plan consisting of the so-called dwell times that a radiation source resides at different positions inside the patient such that the prostate volume and the seminal vesicles are covered by the prescribed radiation dose level as much as possiblewhile the organs at risk, e.g., bladder, rectum, and urethra, are irradiated as little as possible. The problem is highly constrained, following clinical requirements for radiation dose distributionwhile the planning process for treatment planners to design a clinically-Acceptable treatment plan is strictly time-limited. In this paper, we propose that the problem can be formulated as a bi-objective optimization problem that intuitively describes trade-offs between target volumes to be radiated and organs to be spared. We solve this problem with the recently-introduced Multi-Objective Real-Valued Genepool Optimal Mixing Evolutionary Algorithm (MO-RV-GOMEA), which is a promising MOEA that is able to effectively exploit dependencies between problem variables to tackle complicated problems in the continuous domain. MO-RV-GOMEA also has the capability to perform partial evaluations if problem structures allow local variations in existing solutions to be efficiently computed, substantially accelerating the overall optimization performance. Experiments on real medical data and comparison with state-of-Theart MOEAs confirm our claims.@en