Both crash count and severity are thought to quantify crash risk at defined transport network locations (e.g. intersections, a particulate section of highway, etc.). Crash count is a measure of the likelihood of occurring a potential harmful event, whereas crash severity is a measure of the societal impact and harm to the society. As the majority of safety improvement programs are focused on preventing fatal and serious injury crashes, identification of high-risk sites—or blackspots—should ideally account for both severity and frequency of crashes. Past research efforts to incorporate crash severity into the identification of high-risk sites include multivariate crash count models, equivalent property damage only models and two-stage mixed models. These models, however, often require suitable distributional assumptions for computational efficiency, neglect the ordinal nature of crash severity, and are inadequate for capturing unobserved heterogeneity arising from possible correlations between crash counts of different severity levels. These limitations can ultimately lead to inefficient allocation of resources and misidentification of sites with high risk of fatal and serious injury crashes. Moreover, the implication of these models in blackspot identification is an important, unanswered question. While a joint econometric model of crash count and crash severity has the flexibility to account for the limitations mentioned previously, its ability to identify high-risk sites also needs to be examined. This study aims to fill this research gap by employing the joint model for blackspot identification. Using data from state-controlled roads in Queensland, Australia, a new risk score is developed based on predicted crash counts by severity, weighted by the cost ratio of severity levels. This weighted risk score is then used for identifying road segments with high risk of fatal and injury crashes. Results show that the joint model of crash count and crash severity has substantially improved prediction accuracy compared to the traditional count models. The correlation between crash counts of different severity levels captures the unobserved heterogeneity caused by the extra-variation in total crash counts and moderates the parameters in the joint model. In comparison with the traditional approaches, the proposed weighted risk score approach with the joint model of crash count and crash severity leads to the identification of a higher number of fatal and serious injury crashes in the top ranked sites flagged for safety improvements.

@en

The adaptive behaviour of mobile phone distracted drivers has been a topic of much discussion in the recent literature, but the mechanisms of behavioural adaptation are still unclear. This study investigated the influence of driving demands, secondary task characteristics, and personal characteristics on behavioural adaptation of mobile phone distracted drivers. In particular, distracted drivers’ self-regulation at strategic, tactical, and operational levels was investigated through a driving simulator experiment. In a high-fidelity driving simulator, participants driving through various driving conditions (e.g. interactions with pedestrian crossings, signalized intersections, merging ramps, roundabouts, etc.) needed to decide where and how to perform the following four mobile phone tasks: (a) ring a doctor and cancel an appointment, (b) text a friend and tell him/her that the participant will be arriving 10 min late, (c) share the doctor's phone number with a friend, and (d) take a 'selfie’. At a strategic level, the decision to pull over was modelled as a function of self-reported personal/attitudinal characteristics with a logistic regression model. Similarly, tactical self-regulation (decision to engage in a task while driving in a specific situation) and operational self-regulation (decision to temporarily stop the mobile phone task) were modelled as a function of driving demands and personal/attitudinal characteristics using a random-effects logistic regression model, which accounts for correlations resulting from multiple observations of a driver. Results suggest that tactical self-regulation is more common among distracted drivers followed by operational and strategic self-regulation. Personal beliefs regarding how safe it is to use the mobile phone for texting/browsing while driving were predictors of self-regulation for all levels. Drivers were observed to use the mobile phone more when the driving demands are low, e.g. while stopped at an intersection. This research suggests that distracted drivers engage in various levels of self-regulation, and future research could be focused on further theoretical refinement and development of technology-based interventions.@en

The precision and bias of Safety Performance Functions (SPFs) heavily rely on the data upon which they are estimated. When local (spatially and temporally representative) data are not sufficiently available, the estimated parameters in SPFs are likely to be biased and inefficient. Estimating SPFs using Bayesian inference may moderate the effects of local data insufficiency in that local data can be combined with prior information obtained from other parts of the world to incorporate additional evidence into the SPFs. In past applications of Bayesian models, non-informative priors have routinely been used because incorporating prior information in SPFs is not straightforward. The previous few attempts to employ informative priors in estimating SPFs are mostly based on local prior knowledge and assuming normally distributed priors. Moreover, the unobserved heterogeneity in local data has not been taken into account. As such, the effects of globally derived informative priors on the precision and bias of locally developed SPFs are essentially unknown. This study aims to examine the effects of globally informative priors and their distribution types on the precision and bias of SPFs developed for Australian crash data. To formulate and develop global informative priors, the means and variances of parameter estimates from previous research were critically reviewed. Informative priors were generated using three methods: 1) distribution fitting, 2) endogenous specification of dispersion parameters, and 3) hypothetically increasing the strength of priors obtained from distribution fitting. In so doing, the mean effects of crash contributing factors across the world are significantly different than those same effects in Australia. A total of 25 Bayesian Random Parameters Negative Binomial SPFs were estimated for different types of informative priors across five sample sizes. The means and standard deviations of posterior parameter estimates as well as SPFs goodness of fit were compared between the models across different sample sizes. Globally informative prior for the dispersion parameter substantially increases the precision of a local estimate, even when the variance of local data likelihood is small. In comparison with the conventional use of Normal distribution, Logistic, Weibull and Lognormal distributions yield more accurate parameter estimates for average annual daily traffic, segment length and number of lanes, particularly when sample size is relatively small.@en

Missing data can lead to biased and inefficient parameter estimates in statistical models, depending on the missing data mechanism. Count regression models are no exception, with missing data leading to incorrect inferences about the effects of explanatory variables. A convenient approach for dealing with missing data is to remove observations with incomplete records prior to the analysis – often referred to as case-wise deletion. Removing incomplete records, however, reduces the sample size, increases standard errors and, if data are not missing completely at random, produces biased parameter estimates. A more complex approach is multiple imputation, which provides an estimate of the modelling uncertainty created by the data ‘missing-ness’, as distinct from the natural variation in the data. However, multiple imputation produces biased parameter estimates if the probability of missing data is related to the observed data – or is endogenous. Latent variable modelling has recently been introduced as an alternative approach for dealing with missing data, but it comes at a high computational cost and complexity. Despite fairly extensive methodological advancements in statistical literature, case-wise deletion is commonly employed to deal with missing data in statistical models of transport, while the multiple imputation and latent variable approaches remain relatively unexplored. More importantly, the performance of these approaches has not been tested across different types of data missing-ness. To address these gaps, this study aims to contrast case-wise deletion with multiple imputation and latent variable approaches in dealing with missing data in count regression models. We compare the performance of these three approaches using crash count models estimated against empirical data obtained from state controlled roads in Queensland, Australia. A quasi-experimental evaluation of data missing-ness is then conducted by extracting three data subsets from the original dataset, each with a unique missing data mechanism (with terminology adopted from the statistical literature): missing completely at random, missing at random, and missing not at random. The three approaches are then applied to each data subset and the results are compared in terms of bias, precision of parameter estimates, and goodness-of-fit. The findings indicate that multiple imputation is the most effective approach when data are missing either completely at random or at random, whereas the latent variable approach is more effective when data are missing not at random. However, the effectiveness of the latent variable approach is dependent on the availability of suitable variables as instruments in the data.@en

The frequency and severity of traffic crashes have commonly been used as indicators of crash risk on transport networks. Comprehensive modeling of crash risk should account for both frequency and injury severity—capturing both the extent and intensity of transport risk for designing effective safety improvement programs. Previous research has revealed that crashes are correlated across severity categories because of the combined influence of risk factors, observed or unobserved. Moreover, crashes are the outcomes of a multitude of factors related to roadway design, traffic operations, pavement conditions, driver behavior, human factors, and environmental characteristics, or in more general terms: factors reflect both engineering and non-engineering risk sources. Perhaps not surprisingly, engineering risk sources have dominated the list of variables in the mainstream modeling of crashes whereas non-engineering sources, in particular, behavioral factors, are crucially omitted. It is plausible to assume that crash contributing factors from the same risk source affect crashes in a similar manner, but their influences vary across different risk sources. Conventional crash frequency modeling hypothesizes that the total crash count at any roadway site is well-approximated by a single risk source to which several explanatory variables contribute collaboratively. The conventional formulation is not capable of accounting for variations between risk sources; therefore, is unable to discriminate distinct impacts between engineering variables and non-engineering variables. To address this shortcoming, this study contributes to the development of multivariate multiple risk source regression, a robust modeling technique to model crash frequency and severity simultaneously. The multivariate multiple risk source regression method applied in this study can effectively capture the correlation between severity levels of crash counts while identifyinging the varying effects of crash contributing factors originated from distinct sources. Using crashes on Wisconsin rural two-lane highways, two risk sources – engineering and behavioral – were employed to develop proposed models. The modeling results were compared with a single equation negative binomial (NB) model, and a univariate multiple risk source model. The results show that the multivariate multiple risk source model significantly outperforms the other models in terms of statistical fit across several measures. The study demonstrates a unique approach to explicitly incorporating behavioral factors into crash prediction models while taking crash severity into consideration. More importantly, the parameter estimates provide more insight into the distinct sources of crash risk, which can be used to further inform safety practitioners and guide roadway improvement programs.@en

In the safety literature, motor vehicle crashes are modelled predominately using single equation regression models, albeit with a variety of distributional assumptions and econometric enhancements. These models rely on a single linear additive predictive equation—which becomes multiplicative with a log transform—to specify the expected mean crash count conditioned on predictors. The models also specify the distribution of observations around the conditional mean, with common examples including the Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Conway-Maxwell distribution among others. This mainstream probabilistic conceptualization (i.e. model) of motor vehicle crash causation assumes that crashes are well-approximated by a single source of risk, wherein several contributing factors exert their collective, non-independent influences on the occurrence of crashes via a linear predictor. This study first postulates, and then demonstrates empirically, that crash occurrence may be more complex than can be adequately captured by a single equation regression model. The total crash count recorded at a transport network location (e.g. road segment) may arise from multiple simultaneous and inter-dependent sources of risk, rather than one. Each of these sources may uniquely contribute to the total observed crash count. For instance, a site's crash occurrence may be dominated by contributions from driver behaviour issues (e.g. speeding, impaired driving), while another site's crashes might arise predominately from design and operational deficiencies such as deteriorating pavements and worn lane markings. Stated succinctly, this research hypothesises that the unobserved heterogeneity in the accumulation of motor vehicle crashes at transport network locations arises because multiple sources of risk, not one, better captures complexity in the crash occurrence process. A stochastic multiple risk source methodological approach is developed to correspond with and empirically test this hypothesis. A joint econometric model with random parameters and instrumental variables demonstrates the applicability of the proposed theory and the corresponding methodological approach. The proposed model assumes that complexity of crash occurrence is well approximated using three sources of risk comprised of engineering, unobserved spatial, and driver behavioural factors. It is empirically tested using crash data from state controlled roads in Queensland, Australia. Finally, the multiple risk source model is compared to the traditional single risk source model to assess the viability of the proposed approach based on the sample data. The multiple risk source model significantly outperformed the single risk source model in terms of prediction ability and goodness of fit measures. In addition, while the single risk source model predicts total crash counts for individual sites, the multiple risk source model predicts crash count proportions contributed by each source of risk, and predicts crashes by risk source. The improvement in fit combined with the theoretical appeal of a multiple risk source model to explain unobserved heterogeneity in crashes suggests—at least for the sample used in the study—that the complexity in crash occurrence is better explained using multiple equation linear predictors. Further research should examine other datasets for repeatability and should further explore and test risk sources.

@en

This study investigated how situational characteristics typically encountered in the transport system influence drivers’ perceived likelihood of engaging in mobile phone multitasking. The impacts of mobile phone tasks, perceived environmental complexity/risk, and drivers' individual differences were evaluated as relevant individual predictors within the behavioral adaptation framework. An innovative questionnaire, which includes randomized textual and visual scenarios, was administered to collect data from a sample of 447 drivers in South East Queensland-Australia (66% females; n = 296). The likelihood of engaging in a mobile phone task across various scenarios was modeled by a random parameters ordered probit model. Results indicated that drivers who are female, are frequent users of phones for texting/answering calls, have less favorable attitudes towards safety, and are highly disinhibited were more likely to report stronger intentions of engaging in mobile phone multitasking. However, more years with a valid driving license, self-efficacy toward self-regulation in demanding traffic conditions and police enforcement, texting tasks, and demanding traffic conditions were negatively related to self-reported likelihood of mobile phone multitasking. The unobserved heterogeneity warned of riskier groups among female drivers and participants who need a lot of convincing to believe that multitasking while driving is dangerous. This research concludes that behavioral adaptation theory is a robust framework explaining self-regulation of distracted drivers.@en

Objective: The speed selection behavior of drivers has been reported to vary across driver demographics, psychological attributes, and vehicle-specific factors. In contrast, the effects of roadway geometric, traffic characteristics, and site-specific factors on speed selection are less well known. In addition, the relative degree of speeding has received little attention and thus remains relatively unexplored. This study aims to investigate the effects of roadway geometrics, traffic characteristics, and site-specific factors on speeding behavior of drivers. Methods: A panel mixed logit fractional split model is estimated to analyze the proportion of speed limit violations across highway segments. To account for possible unobserved heterogeneity, the suitability of latent class model specification is also tested. Speeding data were collected from speed cameras along major arterials and highways in Queensland, Australia, and were merged with several other data sources including roadway geometric characteristics, spatial features of the surrounding environment, and driver behavioral factors. Results: The results of the panel mixed logit fractional split model suggest a tendency among drivers to commit minor speed limit violations irrespective of causal factors. Among potential road geometric and traffic factors, radius of horizontal curves, percentage of heavy vehicle traffic on segments with divided median, posted speed limit, and road functional classification are factors that influence speeding behavior. Additionally, the deployment of covert speed cameras is found to decrease the likelihood of major speed limit violations along arterials or highways. Conclusions: An understanding of the influence of roadway geometrics and traffic characteristics on speeding behavior of drivers will inform the design of targeted countermeasures in order to reduce speed limit violations along highways.@en

Purpose – The purpose of this chapter is to review the methodological and empirical underpinnings of transport network screening, or management, as it relates to improving road safety. As jurisdictions around the world are charged with transport network management in order to reduce externalities associated with road crashes, identifying potential blackspots or hotspots is an important if not critical function and responsibility of transport agencies. Methodology – Key references from within the literature are summarised and discussed, along with a discussion of the evolution of thinking around hotspot identification and management. The theoretical developments that correspond with the evolution in thinking are provided, sprinkled with examples along the way. Findings – Hotspot identification methodologies have evolved considerably over the past 30 or so years, correcting for methodological deficiencies along the way. Despite vast and significant advancements, identifying hotspots remains a reactive approach to managing road safety – relying on crashes to accrue in order to mitigate their occurrence. The most fruitful directions for future research will be in the establishment of reliable relationships between surrogate measures of road safety – such as ‘near misses’ – and actual crashes – so that safety can be proactively managed without the need for crashes to accrue. Research implications – Research in hotspot identification will continue; however, it is likely to shift over time to both closer to ‘real-time’ crash risk detection and considering safety improvements using surrogate measures of road safety – described in Chapter 17. Practical implications – There are two types of errors made in hotspot detection – identifying a ‘risky’ site as ‘safe’ and identifying a ‘safe’ site as ‘risky’. In the former case no investments will be made to improve safety, while in the latter case ineffective or inefficient safety improvements could be made. To minimise these errors, transport network safety managers should be applying the current state of the practice methods for hotspot detection. Moreover, transport network safety managers should be eager to transition to proactive methods of network safety management to avoid the need for crashes to occur. While in its infancy, the use of surrogate measures of safety holds significant promise for the future.@en

Distracted driving is one of the most significant human factor issues in transport safety. Mobile phone interactions while driving may involve a multitude of cognitive and physical resources that result in inferior driving performance and reduced safety margins. The current study investigates characteristics of usage, risk factors, compensatory strategies in use and characteristics of high-frequency offenders of mobile phone use while driving. A series of questions were administered to drivers in Queensland (Australia) using an on-line questionnaire. A total of 484 drivers (34.9% males and 49.8% aged 17–25) participated anonymously. At least one of every two motorists surveyed reported engaging in distracted driving. Drivers were unable to acknowledge the increased crash risk associated with answering and locating a ringing phone in contrast to other tasks such as texting/browsing. Attitudes towards mobile phone usage were more favourable for talking than texting or browsing. Lowering the driving speed and increasing the distance from the vehicle in front were the most popular task-management strategies for talking and texting/browsing while driving. On the other hand, keeping the mobile phone low (e.g. in the driver’s lap or on the passenger seat) was the favourite strategy used by drivers to avoid police fines for both talking and texting/browsing. Logistic regression models were fitted to understand differences in risk factors for engaging in mobile phone conversations and browsing/texting while driving. For both tasks, exposure to driving, driving experience, driving history (offences and crashes), and attitudes were significant predictors. Future mobile phone prevention efforts would benefit from development of safe attitudes and increasing risk literacy. Enforcement of mobile phone distraction should be re-engineered, as the use of task-management strategies to evade police enforcement seems to dilute its effect on the prevention of this behaviour. Some countermeasures and suggestions were proposed in the design of public education campaigns and driver-mobile phone interaction.@en

The use of mobile phones while driving remains a major human factors issue in the transport system. A significant safety concern is that driving while distracted by a mobile phone potentially modifies the driving speed leading to conflicts with other road users and consequently increases crash risk. However, the lack of systematic knowledge of the mechanisms involved in speed adaptation of distracted drivers constrains the explanation and modelling of the extent of this phenomenon. The objective of this study was to investigate speed adaptation of distracted drivers under varying road infrastructure and traffic complexity conditions. The CARRS-Q Advanced Driving Simulator was used to test participants on a simulated road with different traffic conditions, such as free flow traffic along straight roads, driving in urbanized areas, and driving in heavy traffic along suburban roads. Thirty-two licensed young drivers drove the simulator under three phone conditions: baseline (no phone conversation), hands-free and handheld phone conversations. To understand the relationships between distraction, road infrastructure and traffic complexity, speed adaptation calculated as the deviation of driving speed from the posted speed limit was modelled using a decision tree. The identified groups of road infrastructure and traffic characteristics from the decision tree were then modelled with a Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with repeated measures to develop inferences about speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers. The GLMM also included driver characteristics and secondary task demands as predictors of speed adaptation. Results indicated that complex road environments like urbanization, car-following situations along suburban roads, and curved road alignment significantly influenced speed adaptation behaviour. Distracted drivers selected a lower speed while driving along a curved road or during car-following situations, but speed adaptation was negligible in the presence of high visual cutter, indicating the prioritization of the driving task over the secondary task. Additionally, drivers who scored high on self-reported safe attitudes towards mobile phone usage, and who reported prior involvement in a road traffic crash, selected a lower driving speed in the distracted condition than in the baseline. The results aid in understanding how driving task demands influence speed adaptation of distracted drivers under various road infrastructure and traffic complexity conditions.@en

Objective: The adaptive behavior of mobile phone–distracted drivers has been a topic of much discussion in the recent literature. Both simulator and naturalistic studies suggest that distracted drivers generally select lower driving speeds; however, speed adaptation is not observed among all drivers, and the mechanisms of speed selection are not well understood. The aim of this research was to apply a driver behavioral adaptation model to investigate the speed adaptation of mobile phone–distracted drivers. Methods: The speed selection behavior of drivers was observed in 3 phone conditions including baseline (no conversation) and hands-free and handheld phone conversations in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Speed adaptation in each phone condition was modeled as a function of secondary task demand and self-reported personal/psychological characteristics with a system of seemingly unrelated equations (SURE) accounting for potential correlations due to repeated measures experiment design. Results: Speed adaptation is similar between hands-free and handheld phone conditions, but the predictors of speed adaptation vary across the phone conditions. Though perceived workload of secondary task demand, self-efficacy, attitude toward safety, and driver demographics were significant predictors of speed adaptation in the handheld condition, drivers' familiarity with the hands-free interface, attitude toward safety, and sensation seeking were significant predictors in the hands-free condition. Drivers who reported more positive safety attitudes selected lower driving speeds while using phones. Conclusion: This research confirmed that behavioral adaptation models are suitable for explaining speed adaptation of mobile phone distracted drivers, and future research could be focused on further theoretical refinement.@en

The use of mobile phones while driving—one of the most common driver distractions—has been a significant research interest during the most recent decade. While there has been a considerable amount research and excellent reviews on how mobile phone distractions influence various aspects of driving performance, the mechanisms by which the interactions with mobile phone affect driver performance is relatively unexamined. As such, the aim of this study is to examine the mechanisms involved with mobile phone distractions such as conversing, texting, and reading and the driving task, and subsequent outcomes. A novel human-machine framework is proposed to isolate the components and various interactions associated with mobile phone distracted driving. The proposed framework specifies the impacts of mobile phone distraction as an inter-related system of outcomes such as speed selection, lane deviations and crashes; human-car controls such as steering control and brake pedal use and human-environment interactions such as visual scanning and navigation. Eleven literature-review/meta-analyses papers and 62 recent research articles from 2005 to 2015 are critically reviewed and synthesised following a systematic classification scheme derived from the human-machine system framework. The analysis shows that while many studies have attempted to measure system outcomes or driving performance, research on how drivers interactively manage in-vehicle secondary tasks and adapt their driving behaviour while distracted is scant. A systematic approach may bolster efforts to examine comprehensively the performance of distracted drivers and their impact over the transportation system by considering all system components and interactions of drivers with mobile phones and vehicles. The proposed human-machine framework not only contributes to the literature on mobile phone distraction and safety, but also assists in identifying the research needs and promising strategies for mitigating mobile phone-related safety issues. Technology based countermeasures that can provide real-time feedback or alerts to drivers based on eye/head movements in conjunction with vehicle dynamics should be an important research direction.@en

The state of the practice in black spot identification uses safety performance functions based on total crash counts to identify high-risk crash sites. This paper postulates that total crash count is a result of multiple distinct risk-generating processes (RGPs), including geometric characteristics of the road, spatial features of the surrounding environment, and driver behavior factors. However, these multiple sources are ignored in current modeling methodologies that try to explain or predict crash frequencies across sites. Instead, current practice uses models that imply that a single RGP exists. This misspecification may lead to correlation of crashes with incorrect sources of contributing factors (e.g., concluding a crash is predominately caused by a geometric feature when the cause is a behavioral issue), which may ultimately lead to inefficient use of public funds and misidentification of true black spots. This study proposes a latent class model consistent with a multiple risk process theory and investigates the influence this model has on correctly identifying crash black spots. The paper presents the theoretical and corresponding methodological approach in which a Bayesian latent class model is estimated with the assumption that crashes arise from two distinct RGPs, including engineering and unobserved spatial factors. The methodology was applied to state-controlled roads in Queensland, Australia. The results were compared with an empirical Bayesian negative binomial (EB-NB) model. A comparison of goodness-of-fit measures illustrated superiority of the proposed model compared with the NB model. The detection of black spots was improved compared with the EB-NB model. In addition, modeling crashes as the result of two fundamentally separate RGPs reveals more detailed information about unobserved crash causes.@en

The use of mobile phones while driving is increasing at an alarming rate despite the associated crash risks. A significant safety concern is that driving while distracted by a mobile phone is more prevalent among young drivers, a less experienced driving cohort with elevated crash risk. The objective of this study was to examine the gap acceptance behavior of distracted young drivers at roundabouts. The Center for Accident Research and Road Safety-Queensland Advanced Driving Simulator was used to test participants on a simulated gap acceptance scenario at roundabouts. Conflicting traffic approaching from the right of a four-legged roundabout was programmed to show a series of vehicles with the gaps between them proportionately increased from 2 s to 6 s. Thirty-Two licensed young drivers drove the simulator under three phone conditions: baseline (no phone conversation), a hands-free phone conversation, and a handheld phone conversation. Results show that distracted drivers started responding to the gap acceptance scenario when they were closer to the roundabout and they approached the roundabout at slower speeds. These drivers also decelerated at faster rates to reduce their speeds before gap acceptance compared with nondistracted drivers. Although accepted gap sizes were not significantly different across phone conditions, differences in the safety margin at various gap sizes-measured by postencroachment time (PET) between the driven vehicle and the conflicting vehicle-were statistically significant across phone conditions. PETs for distracted drivers were smaller across different gap sizes and suggest that a smaller safety margin was accepted by distracted drivers compared with nondistracted drivers.@en