Background: Personas are a technique for enhanced understanding of users and customers to improve the user-centered design of systems and products. Their creation can be categorized using three persona creation methodologies: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. Despite the apparent differences in these methodologies, no previous review has systemically compared and contrasted the strengths and weaknesses of each of these methodologies for persona development. Method: This manuscript maps and navigates persona literature to identify the benefits and challenges of these three persona creation methodologies. Furthermore, the strategies and opportunities of the different methodologies are presented. Results: The results summarize the strengths and weaknesses of each of the three principal persona creation methodologies and offer suggestions of the benefits of their employment. Conclusion: In conclusion, we offer insights into the construction and usage of personas for practitioners and researchers, and we propose a framework to determine which persona creation methodology is most suitable for a given context.@en

Persona is a technique for enhancing user understanding and improving the user-centered design of digital products. Persona creation has traditionally been divided into Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods approaches. However, no literature systematically contrasts the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches. We review the literature to map the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches and evaluate the potential of personas for the domain of digital innovation. We provide insights for better creation and use of personas by both researchers and practitioners, especially those that are new to personas, deploying personas in a new domain, or familiar with only one of the persona creation approaches.@en

Practitioners in user-centric industries have increasingly recognized the applicability of personas. However, the methods used to create personas in different domains remain inconsistent and unsystematic. We analyzed 51 studies focused on designing personas for professional purposes and find the practice most prevalent in the user experience (UX) design, healthcare, market research, and social media strategy domains. Within these domains, UX design personas are characterized by their focus on user activity and goals, market research personas on customers' lifestyles, health personas on medical patients' physical symptoms, and social media strategy personas on interactions within online communities. We identify and compare the elements in the personas. Based on this, we provide guidelines for professionals interested in developing personas for recruiting users, understanding barriers to positive user experience, and building online communities, including how to represent persona details related to lifestyle, contexts of product usage, and scaling of online data.@en

Following the proliferation of personified big data and data science algorithms, data-driven user personas (DDPs) are becoming more common in persona design. However, the DDP templates are seemingly diverse and fragmented, prompting a need for a synthesis of the information included in these personas. Analyzing 31 templates for DDPs, we find that DDPs vary greatly by their information richness, as the most informative layout has more than 300% more information categories than the least informative layout. We also find that graphical complexity and information richness do not necessarily correlate. Furthermore, the chosen persona development method may carry over to the information presentation, with quantitative data typically presented as scores, metrics, or tables and qualitative data as text-rich narratives. We did not find one “general template” for DDPs and defining this is difficult due to the variety of the outputs of different methods as well as different information needs of the persona users.@en