Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) is one of the most common web application vulnerabilities. It is therefore sometimes referred to as the “buffer overflow of the web.” Drawing a parallel from the current state of practice in preventing unauthorized native code execution (the typical goal in a code injection), we propose a script whitelisting approach to tame JavaScript-driven XSS attacks. Our scheme involves a transparent script interception layer placed in the browser's JavaScript engine. This layer is designed to detect every script that reaches the browser, from every possible route, and compare it to a list of valid scripts for the site or page being accessed; scripts not on the list are prevented from executing. To avoid the false positives caused by minor syntactic changes (e.g., due to dynamic code generation), our layer uses the concept of contextual fingerprints when comparing scripts. Contextual fingerprints are identifiers that represent specific elements of a script and its execution context. Fingerprints can be easily enriched with new elements, if needed, to enhance the proposed method's robustness. The list can be populated by the website's administrators or a trusted third party. To verify our approach, we have developed a prototype and tested it successfully against an extensive array of attacks that were performed on more than 50 real-world vulnerable web applications. We measured the browsing performance overhead of the proposed solution on eight websites that make heavy use of JavaScript. Our mechanism imposed an average overhead of 11.1% on the execution time of the JavaScript engine. When measured as part of a full browsing session, and for all tested websites, the overhead introduced by our layer was less than 0.05%. When script elements are altered or new scripts are added on the server side, a new fingerprint generation phase is required. To examine the temporal aspect of contextual fingerprints, we performed a short-term and a long-term experiment based on the same websites. The former, showed that in a short period of time (10 days), for seven of eight websites, the majority of valid fingerprints stay the same (more than 92% on average). The latter, though, indicated that, in the long run, the number of fingerprints that do not change is reduced. Both experiments can be seen as one of the first attempts to study the feasibility of a whitelisting approach for the web.@en

Software vulnerabilities can severely affect an organization's infrastructure and cause significant financial damage to it. A number of tools and techniques are available for performing vulnerability detection in software written in various programming platforms, in a pursuit to mitigate such defects. However, since the requirements for running such tools and the formats in which they store and present their results vary wildly, it is difficult to utilize many of them in the scope of a project. By simplifying the process of running a variety of vulnerability detectors and collecting their results in an efficient, automated manner during development, the task of tracking security defects throughout the evolution history of software projects is bolstered. In this paper we present tracer, a software framework and platform to support the development of more secure applications by constantly mon- itoring software projects for vulnerabilities. The platform allows the easy integration of existing tools that statically detect software vulnerabilities and promotes their use during software development and maintenance. To demonstrate the efficiency and usability of the platform, we integrated two popular static analysis tools, FindBugs and Frama-c as sample implementations, and report on preliminary results from their use.@en

A security vulnerability is a programming error that introduces a potentially exploitable weakness into a computer system. Such a vulnerability can severely affect an organization's infrastructure and cause significant financial damage to it. Hence, one of the basic pursuits in every new software release should be to mitigate such defects. A number of tools and techniques are available for performing vulnerability detection in software written in various programming platforms. One of the most common approaches to identify software vulnerabilities is static analysis [1]. This kind of analysis is performed by automated tools either on the program's source or object code and without actually executing it. However, since the formats in which static analysis tools store and present their results vary wildly, it is typically difficult to utilize many of them in the scope of a project. By automating the process of running a variety of vulnerability detectors and collecting their results in an efficient manner during development, the task of tracking security defects throughout the evolution history of software projects can be simplified. In this paper we present TRACER, a framework to support the development of secure applications by constantly monitoring software projects for vulnerabilities. TRACER simplifies the integration of existing tools that detect software vulnerabilities and promotes their use during development and maintenance. Instead of designing and implementing TRACER from the ground up, we built it on top of the open source Alitheia Core [2] platform, which is designed for facilitating large scale quantitative software engineering studies. While Alitheia Core aims for efficient estimation of the quality of software projects, TRACER was designed with a focus on software security. To support the specific objectives of TRACER, a set of new components was added at each level of the Alitheia Core architecture. These include a model for representing software vulnerabilities, a mechanism for automatic vulnerability detection triggering, a REST API for accessing the analysis results, and an archetype for plug-ins to integrate new vulnerability detection tools in the platform. Like Alitheia Core, TRACER monitors multiple data sources associated with the development of a software project, such as the source code repository and bug tracking system, and automatically analyzes each revision. Therefore it can be used to track security defects throughout the evolution of a project. In most cases, the detection of vulnerabilities on a software artifact involves only two steps: invoking an external tool created for this purpose with specific arguments as required, and evaluating the results it generates. There is a vast number of software vulnerability detection tools available, each one having different operating requirements. Such a tool can be integrated in TRACER by creating a corresponding driver that implements these two steps and stores the results using the data model provided by the platform. Thus we can leverage the functionality provided by existing tools, without duplicating it. Such an external tool driver is called a vulnerability detector plug-in, and it uses the Alitheia Core infrastructure to handle automatic activation, as well as storage and retrieval of results. Each vulnerability detector is associated with the set of vulnerability types it can detect and the different types of software artifacts or programming constructs that it can analyze. This allows the platform to automatically trigger it when needing to check if a software project or artifact is vulnerable to a specific type of attacks or a new artifact is submitted to the system for evaluation. To demonstrate the efficiency and usability of the platform, we have created plug-ins to integrate two different tools for vulnerability detection, namely: FindBugs [3], and Frama-c [4]. The former analyzes applications written in Java, while the latter examines applications written in c. This highlights the fact that our platform does not depend on the programming language used to develop the project that is being analyzed, and that the simplicity of integrating third party tools leads to high levels of expandability of the platform.

@en