External and internal factors can cause disturbances or disruptions in daily train operations, leading to deviations from official timetables and passenger delays. As a result, efficient train timetable rescheduling (TTR) methods are necessary to restore disrupted train services. Although TTR has been a popular research topic in recent years, the uncertain characteristics of railways have not been sufficiently addressed. This review first identifies the primary uncertainties of TTR and examines their impacts on both TTR and passenger routing during disturbances or disruptions. It finds that only a few uncertainties have been investigated, and the existing solution methods do not adequately meet practical requirements, such as considering the dynamic nature of disturbances or disruptions, which is crucial for real-world applications. Therefore, the review highlights problems associated with TTR uncertainties that need urgent attention and suggests promising methodologies that could effectively address these issues as future research directions. This review aims to help practitioners develop improved automatic train-dispatching systems with better train-rescheduling performance under disturbances or disruptions compared to current systems.

Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young patients usually result from high-energy violence, and the vertical transcervical type is typically challenging for its instability. FNFs are commonly treated with three cannulated screws (CS), but the role of screws type on fixation effects (FE) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the FE of ten types of CS with different diameters, lengths, depths, and pitches of thread via finite element analysis which was validated by a biomechanical test. Ten vertical FNF models were grouped, fixed by ten types of CS, respectively, all in a parallel, inverted triangular configuration. Their FE were scored comprehensively from six aspects via an entropy evaluation method, as higher scores showed better results. For partial-thread screws, thread length and thread shape factor (TSF) are determinative factors on stability of FNF only if thread depth is not too thick, and they have less cut-out risk, better compression effects and better detached resistance of fracture than full-thread screws, whereas full-thread screws appear to have better shear and shortening resistance. A combination of two superior partial-thread screws and one inferior full-thread screw for vertical FNF may get optimal biomechanical outcomes. The type of cannulated screw is important to consider when treating vertical FNF.