Comparing 2D and 3D linear response of a simplified LNG membrane cargo containment system

Bos, R.W.; Kaminski, ML

Comparing 2D and 3D linear response of a simplified LNG membrane cargo containment system

Conference paper (2018)

Authors

R.W. Bos Ship Hydromechanics and Structures

ML Kaminski Ship Hydromechanics and Structures

Research Group

Ship Hydromechanics and Structures

LNG Response Cargo containment system Simplified 2D and 3D loads

To reference this document use:

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:fd45f0f5-13e9-460a-a1bf-fa30f852591b

More Info

expand_more

Published Date

2018

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Research Group

Ship Hydromechanics and Structures

Abstract

The difference between 2D and 3D response is quantified using wide loads with different slopes and concentrated loads with different impact locations. For wide loads the slope is not important for the maximum indentation, but does effect the maximum stress. Similarly, when a concentrated load is small compared to the panel, the impact location is not important. There is however a large difference in response between the wide and concentrated loads. To conclude: the 2D response is only valid for wide loads with small slopes.

Files

ISOPE_I_18_672.pdf

(pdf | 13.6 Mb)

License info not available

Download not available