Recent Developments in the Design of Conventional Rubble Mound Structures

Abstract

Conventional rubble mound structures such as breakwaters, seawalls, and revetments are the most common type of coastal structures around the world used to protect harbour basins and embankments from wave action. To have a safe and economic design, two aspects need to be considered. The first one is the structural stability where the required armor size (weight) must be determined. The second aspect is the safety, where the crest freeboard of the structure is usually determined based on the allowable mean wave overtopping rate. Several semi-empirical formulas have been developed for these purposes. These formulas, which have evolved over time, are generally semi-empirical and based on the small-scale laboratory experiments where both incident wave characteristics and the structure configuration are considered. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the performance of existing formulas developed for the assessing the stability and mean overtopping rate of conventional rubble mound structures, while also introducing the recent ones. The Rock Manual formulas for the slope stability and EurOtop formula for estimating the mean overtopping rate will be discussed, and their performances will be compared with those of more recent and comprehensive ones using both lab and field data. It will be shown that the recent formulas that utilize the spectral energy mean period for stability analysis and run-up for the mean overtopping rate are more robust and physically sound. Finally, design formulas and uncertainty estimates are presented, along with guidance for practitioners.