Novel Method for Mitigating Injectivity Issues during Polymer Flooding at High Salinity Conditions

Abstract

Synthetic polymers, in the emulsified form, have been utilized for enhanced oil recovery applications by using saline make-up water. However, there are concerns that have been raised about their injectivity. The large entangled polymer chains can clog the pore throats, giving a tendency to cause injectivity reduction. In this study, processing techniques were used to condition an acrylamide-based copolymer inverse emulsion system at a salinity of 50,000 ppm TDS before being injected into porous media. The investigated polymer solution contained 4,000 ppm active emulsion-polymer and 2,400 ppm surfactant, providing a zero-shear rate viscosity of 13 mPas. Shearing with two agitators, a disperser and Ultra-Turrax, at different intensities and pressure-driven flow into a thin capillary reduces the size of the largest polymer and disentangles the polymer chains while maintaining its viscosifying power as much as possible. Subsequently, the filtration ratios (퐹푅) with optimum between 1–1.2 were determined by performing filtration tests in a 1-micron polycarbonate membrane to evaluate the plugging behavior. This was followed by sand-pack flooding tests of differently sheared solutions in order to investigate the impact of pre-conditioning on injectivity.
Bulk experiments enabled the establishment of master curves showing viscosity and screen factor dependences on accumulated energy during pre-shearing, regardless of shear origin. The injected unsheared polymer solution has an 퐹푅 of 1.6 and an injectivity gradient, e.g. ratio of resistance factor over 10 pore volumes, of 2.4. All injected pre-conditioned solutions have an 퐹푅 in the optimal range between 1 to 1.2. By imposing 15 MJ/m3, the disperser-sheared solution improves the injectivity by decreasing the injectivity gradient to 1.3, while the viscosifying power is reduced by 2% and the screen factor by 30%. To reach the same injectivity gradient of 1.3 with Ultra-Turrax, 31 MJ/m3 were imposed, which reduces the viscosity and screen factor by 11% and 44% respectively. The sheared solution into a capillary imposes 50 MJ/m3, giving an injectivity gradient of 2.7. Both viscosity and screen factor are reduced by 19% and 53% respectively. This indicates that the injectivity performance is shear-origin dependent and the resulting polymer structure, when sheared through contractions, has a different alignment as compared to shearing with the agitators, the disperser and Ultra-Turrax.
In conclusion, the rheological dependencies of sheared polymer solutions form a master curve dependent of accumulated energy during shearing with different shearing devices. Further, the proven beneficial impact of pre-conditioning with agitators before injection enables a better utilization of polymer flooding operations by reducing the risk of pore plugging.